RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Using a Simulation Centre to Evaluate the Effect of anArtificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System for Depression Treatment on the Physician-Patient Interaction JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.03.20.20039255 DO 10.1101/2020.03.20.20039255 A1 David Benrimoh A1 Myriam Tanguay-Sela A1 Kelly Perlman A1 Sonia Israel A1 Joseph Mehltretter A1 Caitrin Armstrong A1 Robert Fratila A1 Sagar V. Parikh A1 Jordan F. Karp A1 Katherine Heller A1 Ipsit V. Vahia A1 Daniel M. Blumberger A1 Sherif Karama A1 Simone Vigod A1 Gail Myhr A1 Ruben Martins A1 Colleen Rollins A1 Christina Popescu A1 Eryn Lundrigan A1 Emily Snook A1 Marina Wakid A1 Jérôme Williams A1 Ghassen Soufi A1 Tamara Perez A1 Jingla-Fri Tunteng A1 Katherine Rosenfeld A1 Marc Miresco A1 Gustavo Turecki A1 Liliana Gomez Cardona A1 Outi Linnaranta A1 Howard C. Margolese YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/30/2020.03.20.20039255.abstract AB Objective Aifred is an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the treatment of major depression. Here, we explore use of a simulation centre environment in evaluating the usability of Aifred, particularly its impact on the physician-patient interaction.Methods Twenty psychiatry and family medicine attending staff and residents were recruited to complete a 2.5-hour study at a clinical interaction simulation centre with standardized patients. Each physician had the option of using the CDSS to inform their treatment choice in three 10-minute clinical scenarios with standardized patients portraying mild, moderate, and severe episodes of major depression. Feasibility and acceptability data were collected through self-report questionnaires, scenario observations, interviews, and standardized patient feedback.Results All twenty participants completed the study. Initial results indicate that the tool was acceptable to clinicians and feasible for use during clinical encounters. Clinicians indicated a willingness to use the tool in real clinical practice, a significant degree of trust in the AI’s predictions to assist with treatment selection, and reported that the tool helped increase patient understanding of and trust in treatment. The simulation environment allowed for the evaluation of the tool’s impact on the physician-patient interaction.Conclusions The simulation centre allowed for direct observations of clinician use and impact of the tool on the clinician-patient interaction prior to clinical studies. It may therefore offer a useful and important environment in the early testing of new technological tools. The present results will inform further tool development and clinician training materials.Competing Interest StatementDavid Benrimoh, Myriam Tanguay-Sela, Kelly Perlman, Sonia Israel, Joseph Mehltretter, Caitrin Armstrong, Robert Fratila, Colleen Rollins and Marc Miresco are shareholders, employees, or directors of Aifred Health. Christina Popescu, Eryn Lundrigan, Emily Snook, Marina Wakid, Jérôme Williams, Ghassen Soufi, Tamara Perez and Katherine Rosenfeld were research assistants paid by Aifred Health. Sagar Parikh, Jordan Karp and Katherine Heller are members of Aifred Health’s scientific advisory board and either have or may in the near future receive shares in the company. Howard Margolese has received honoraria, sponsorship or grants for participation in speaker bureaus, consultation, advisory board meetings and clinical research from Acadia, Amgen, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen-Ortho, Mylan, Otsuka-Lundbeck, Perdue, Pfizer, Shire and SyneuRx International. All other authors report no relevant conflicts.Funding StatementUse of the simulation centre and the work of the SPs was provided as part of the prize for a clinical innovation competition run by McGill University and the Steinberg Centre for Simulation and Interactive Learning, with the generous support of the Hakim family. Research assistants, software, and participant compensation was provided by Aifred Health. The Canadian Federal Government’s Youth Employment Program also provided a grant to support this work.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is not currently publicly available.