PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Xu, Hui
AU  - Yan, Li
AU  - Qiu, Chun (Martin)
AU  - Jiao, Bo
AU  - Chen, Yanyan
AU  - Tan, Xi
AU  - Chen, Zhuo
AU  - Ai, Ling
AU  - Xiao, Yaru
AU  - Luo, Ailin
AU  - Li, Shusheng
TI  - Analysis and Prediction of COVID-19 Patients’ False Negative Results for SARS-CoV-2 Detection with Pharyngeal Swab Specimen: A Retrospective Study
AID  - 10.1101/2020.03.26.20043042
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.03.26.20043042
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/30/2020.03.26.20043042.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/30/2020.03.26.20043042.full
AB  - Background False negative results of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection pose threats to COVID-19 patients and medical workers alike.Objective To develop multivariate models to determine clinical characteristics that contribute to false negative results of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection, and use them to predict false negative results as well as time windows for testing positive.Design Retrospective Cohort Study (Ethics number of Tongji Hospital: No. IRBID: TJ-20200320)Setting A database of outpatients in Tongji Hospital (University Hospital) from 15 January 2020 to 19 February 2020.Patients 1,324 outpatients with COVID-19Measurements Clinical information on CT imaging reports, blood routine tests, and clinic symptoms were collected. A multivariate logistic regression was used to explain and predict false negative testing results of SARS-CoV-2 detection. A multivariate accelerated failure model was used to analyze and predict delayed time windows for testing positive.Results Of the 1,324 outpatients who diagnosed of COVID-19, 633 patients tested positive in their first SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test (47.8%), with a mean age of 51 years (SD=14.9); the rest, which had a mean age of 47 years (SD=15.4), tested negative in the first test. “Ground glass opacity” in a CT imaging report was associated with a lower chance of false negatives (aOR, 0.56), and reduced the length of time window for testing positive by 26%. “Consolidation” was associated with a higher chance of false negatives (aOR, 1.57), and extended the length of time window for testing positive by 44%. In blood routine tests, basophils (aOR, 1.28) and eosinophils (aOR, 1.29) were associated with a higher chance of false negatives, and were found to extend the time window for testing positive by 23% and 41%, respectively. Age and gender also affected the significantly.Limitation Data were generated in a large single-center study.Conclusion Testing outcome and positive window of SARS-CoV-2 detection for COVID-19 patients were associated with CT imaging results, blood routine tests, and clinical symptoms. Taking into account relevant information in CT imaging reports, blood routine tests, and clinical symptoms helped reduce a false negative testing outcome. The predictive AFT model, what we believe to be one of the first statistical models for predicting time window of SARS-CoV-2 detection, could help clinicians improve the accuracy and efficiency of the diagnosis, and hence, optimizes the timing of nucleic acid detection and alleviates the shortage of nucleic acid detection kits around the world.Primary Funding Source None.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.