TY - JOUR T1 - What is required to prevent a second major outbreak of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 upon lifting the metropolitan-wide quarantine of Wuhan city, China JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.03.24.20042374 SP - 2020.03.24.20042374 AU - Lei Zhang AU - Mingwang Shen AU - Xiaomeng Ma AU - Shu Su AU - Wenfeng Gong AU - Jing Wang AU - Yusha Tao AU - Zhuoru Zou AU - Rui Zhao AU - Joseph Lau AU - Wei Li AU - Feng Liu AU - Kai Ye AU - Youfa Wang AU - Guihua Zhuang AU - Christopher K Fairley Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/30/2020.03.24.20042374.abstract N2 - Background The Chinese government implemented a metropolitan-wide quarantine of Wuhan city on 23rd January 2020 to curb the epidemic of the coronavirus COVID-19. Lifting of this quarantine is imminent. We modelled the effects of two key health interventions on the epidemic when the quarantine is lifted.Method We constructed a compartmental dynamic model to forecast the trend of the COVID-19 epidemic at different quarantine lifting dates and investigated the impact of different rates of public contact and facial mask usage on the epidemic.Results We estimated that at the end of the epidemic, a total of 65,572 (46,156-95,264) individuals would be infected by the virus, among which 16,144 (14,422-23,447, 24.6%) would be infected through public contacts, 45,795 (32,390-66,395, 69.7%) through household contact, 3,633 (2,344-5,865, 5.5%) through hospital contacts (including 783 (553-1,134) non-COVID-19 patients and 2,850 (1,801-4,981) medical staff members). A total of 3,262 (1,592-6,470) would die of COVID-19 related pneumonia in Wuhan. For an early lifting date (21st March), facial mask needed to be sustained at a relatively high rate (≥85%) if public contacts were to recover to 100% of the pre-quarantine level. In contrast, lifting the quarantine on 18th April allowed public person-to-person contact adjusted back to the pre-quarantine level with a substantially lower level of facial mask usage (75%). However, a low facial mask usage (<50%) combined with an increased public contact (>100%) would always lead a significant second outbreak in most quarantine lifting scenarios. Lifting the quarantine on 25th April would ensure a smooth decline of the epidemics regardless of the combinations of public contact rates and facial mask usage.Conclusion The prevention of a second epidemic is viable after the metropolitan-wide quarantine is lifted but requires a sustaining high facial mask usage and a low public contact rate.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementLZ is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (8191101420); Thousand Talents Plan Professorship for Young Scholars (3111500001); Xi’An Jiaotong University Young Talent Support Program; Xi’an Jiaotong University Basic Research and Profession Grant (xtr022019003). Mingwang Shen was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 11801435 (MS)); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number 2018M631134); the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant number xjh012019055, xzy032020026); and Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (Grant number: 2019JQ-187).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are given in attached Appendix ER -