RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Applying time series analyses on continuous accelerometry data – a clinical example in older adults with and without cognitive impairment JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2020.03.24.20042226 DO 10.1101/2020.03.24.20042226 A1 Rackoll, Torsten A1 Neumann, Konrad A1 Passmann, Sven A1 Grittner, Ulrike A1 Külzow, Nadine A1 Ladenbauer, Julia A1 Flöel, Agnes YR 2020 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/26/2020.03.24.20042226.abstract AB Introduction Current analysis approaches of accelerometry data use sum score measures which do not provide insight in activity patterns over 24 hours, and thus do not adequately depict circadian activity patterns. Here, we used a functional approach to analyze accelerometer data that models activity pattern and circadian rhythm. As a test case, we demonstrated its application in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and age-matched healthy older volunteers (HOV). Moreover, we assessed the impact of chronotype on distribution of activity data.Methods Data of two studies were pooled for this analysis. Following baseline cognitive assessment participants were provided with accelerometers for seven consecutive days. A function on scalar regression (FoSR) approach was used to analyze 24 hours accelerometer data. In a second step, analyses were controlled for chronotype using the German version of the morningness-eveningness questionnaire (d-MEQ).Results Information on 47 HOV (mean age 66 SD 6 years) and 13 patients with MCI (mean age 69, SD 8 years) were available for this analysis. MCI patients displayed slightly higher activity in the morning hours as compared to HOV (maximum relative activity at 7:35 am: 75.6%, 95% CI 2.6 to 200.4%, p = 0.031). After controlling for d-MEQ, disturbed activity patterns were found in MCI of intermediate or evening chronotype, compared to HOV, i.e., MCI presented with higher activities in the morning hours (peak at 8:40 am: 357.6%, 95% CI 92.9 to 985.1, p < 0.001) and early afternoon hours (peak at 1:40 pm: 401.8%, 95% CI 63.9 to 1436.4, p < 0.001).Discussion Using a novel approach of FoSR, we found timeframes with higher activity levels in MCI patients compared to HOV which were not evident if sum scores of amount of activity were used. In addition, we found that previously described activity patterns as a function of chronotype swere altered in MCI patients, possibly indicating that changes in circadian rhythmicity in neurodegenerative disease are detectable using easy-to-administer accelerometry.Clinical Trials Effects of Brain Stimulation During Nocturnal Sleep on Memory Consolidation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairments, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01782391?term=NCT01782391&rank=1,ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01782391Effects of Brain Stimulation During a Daytime Nap on Memory Consolidation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01782365?term=NCT01782365&rank=1,ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT01782365Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fl 379-10/1; Fl 379-11/1, and DFG-Exc 257).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and analysis scripts are going to be available with publication at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3718578 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3718578 BDIBecks Depression InventoryCIConfidence intervald-MEQMorningness-Eveningness-Questionnaire (german version)ESSEpworth Sleepiness ScaleFDAFunctional data analysisFoSRFunction-on-scalar-regressionMCIMild cognitive impairmentMMSEMini-Mental-State-ExaminationMRIMagnetic Resonance ImagingHOVHealthy older volunteersPANASPositive and Negative Affect SchedulePSQIPittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexSMDStandardized mean differenceSTAIG-X1State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (german version)SVFStress-Verarbeitungs Fragebogen (translated: stress coping questionnaire)tDCStranscranial direct current stimulationWHOQoLWorld Health Organization Quality of Life