TY - JOUR T1 - Optimising age coverage of seasonal influenza vaccination in England: A mathematical and health economic evaluation JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.03.21.20040568 SP - 2020.03.21.20040568 AU - Edward M. Hill AU - Stavros Petrou AU - Henry Forster AU - Simon de Lusignan AU - Ivelina Yonova AU - Matt J. Keeling Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/23/2020.03.21.20040568.abstract N2 - For infectious disease prevention, policy-makers are typically required to base policy decisions in light of operational and monetary restrictions, prohibiting implementation of all candidate interventions. To inform the evidence-base underpinning policy decision making, mathematical and health economic modelling can be a valuable constituent. Applied to England, this study aims to identify the optimal target age groups when extending a seasonal influenza vaccination programme of at-risk individuals to those individuals at low risk of developing complications following infection. To perform this analysis, we utilise an age- and strain-structured transmission model that includes immunity propagation mechanisms which link prior season epidemiological outcomes to immunity at the beginning of the following season. Making use of surveillance data from the past decade in conjunction with our dynamic model, we simulate transmission dynamics of seasonal influenza in England from 2012 to 2018. We infer that modified susceptibility due to natural infection in the previous influenza season is the only immunity propagation mechanism to deliver a non-negligible impact on the transmission dynamics. Further, we discerned case ascertainment to be higher for young infants compared to adults under 65 years old, and uncovered a decrease in case ascertainment as age increased from 65 to 85 years of age. Our health economic appraisal sweeps vaccination age space to determine threshold vaccine dose prices achieving cost-effectiveness under differing paired strategies. In particular, we model offering vaccination to all those low-risk individuals younger than a given age (but no younger than two years old) and all low-risk individuals older than a given age, while maintaining vaccination of at-risk individuals of any age. All posited strategies were deemed cost-effective. In general, the addition of low-risk vaccination programmes whose coverage encompassed children and young adults (aged 20 and below) were highly cost-effective. The inclusion of old age-groups to the low-risk programme typically lessened the cost-effectiveness. Notably, elderly-centric programmes vaccinating from 65-75 years and above had the least permitted expense per vaccine.Competing Interest StatementAlthough not directly related to this study, Simon de Lusignan has received funding through his University for membership of advisory boards for Sanofi and Sequirus, and funding for influenza vaccine studies from GSK and Seqirus. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.Funding StatementEMH, SP and MK are supported by the National Institute for Health Research [Policy Research Programme, Infectious Disease Dynamic Modelling in Health Protection, grant number 027/0089]. MK is funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council through the MathSys CDT [grant number EP/S022244/1]. SP receives financial support as a National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator [NF-SI-0616-10103]. This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) [Policy Research Programme, Infectious Disease Dynamic Modelling in Health Protection, 027/0089]. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe GP consultation data and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data contain confidential information, with public data deposition non-permissible for socioeconomic reasons. The GP consultation data resides with the RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre and are available via the RCGP RSC website (www.rcgp.org.uk/rsc). The HES database resides with NHS Digital and are available via the HES webpage (https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/hospital-episode-statistics). All other raw data utilised in this study are publicly available; relevant references and data repositories are stated within the main manuscript and Supporting Information. https://www.rcgp.org.uk/rsc https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-tools-and-services/data-services/hospital-episode-statistics ER -