PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Tyler J Lane
AU  - Luke R Sheehan
AU  - Shannon E Gray
AU  - Dianne Beck
AU  - Alex Collie
TI  - Step-downs reduce workers’ compensation payments to encourage return to work. Are they effective?
AID  - 10.1101/19012286
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 19012286
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/19/19012286.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/19/19012286.full
AB  - Objective To determine whether step-downs, which cut the rate of compensation paid to injured workers after they have been on benefits for several months, are effective as a return to work incentive.Methods We aggregated administrative claims data from seven Australian workers’ compensation systems to calculate weekly scheme exit rates, a proxy for return to work. Jurisdictions were further subdivided into four injury subgroups: fractures, musculoskeletal, mental health, and other trauma. The effect of step-downs on scheme exit was tested using a regression discontinuity design. Results were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate combined effects and the proportion of variance attributable to heterogeneity.Results The combined effect of step-downs was a 0.86 percentage point (95% CI -1.45 to -0.27) reduction in the exit rate, with significant heterogeneity between jurisdictions (I2 = 68%, p = .003). Neither timing nor magnitude of step-downs was a significant moderator of effects. Within injury subgroups, only fractures had a significant combined effect (-0.84, 95% CI -1.61 to -0.07). Sensitivity analysis indicated potential effects within mental health and musculoskeletal conditions as well.Conclusions The results suggest some workers’ compensation recipients anticipate step-downs and exit the system early to avoid the reduction in income. However, the effects were small and suggest step-downs have marginal practical significance. We conclude that step-downs are generally ineffective as a return to work policy initiative.What is already known about this subject?A number of workers’ compensation systems around the world reduce payments to injured workers after they have been in the system for several months. In Australia, where each state, territory, and Commonwealth system employs step-downs, the stated policy objective is to increase the rate of return to work through financial incentives. However, there is little empirical evidence to either support or reject this claim.What are the new findings?The rate at which claimants exited workers’ compensation systems increased ahead of step-downs taking effect, suggesting an anticipatory effect. However, the effect was relatively small, changing the exit rate by less than a percentage point overall, with substantial heterogeneity between systems.How might this impact on policy or clinical practice in the foreseeable future?While statistically significant, the findings suggest that step-downs provide workers’ compensation claimants little incentive to return to work. Policymakers may need to reconsider step-downs as a component of scheme design, or justify them according to their original purpose, which was to save costs.Competing Interest StatementThe authors previously received salary support from funding provided by the workers’ compensation systems investigated in this study.Clinical Protocols https://osf.io/pt876/ Funding StatementThis study was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Project Grant (DP190102473), as part of the Compensation and Return to Work Effectiveness (COMPARE) Project, and by Safe Work Australia, a government statutory agency that develops national work health and safety and workers’ compensation policy.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAggregated data are publicly available on a FigShare repository, along with analytical code. Case-level data contain identifiable information and have not made available. We have provided cleaning file data at the FigShare repository to demonstrate our approach. The data source is the National Data Set for Compensation-based Statistics, provided by Safe Work Australia https://doi.org/10.26180/5dba1e5b4277a