@article {Puri2020.03.14.20036087, author = {Pranav Puri and Natalie Landman and Robert K. Smoldt and Denis A. Cortese}, title = {Quantifying the Financial Value of Clinical Specialty Choices and its Association with USMLE Step 1 Scores}, elocation-id = {2020.03.14.20036087}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.03.14.20036087}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Importance The factors influencing medical student clinical specialty choice have important implications for the future composition of the US physician workforce. The objective of this study was to determine the career net present values of US medical students{\textquoteright} clinical specialty choices and identify any relationships between a specialty{\textquoteright}s net present value and competitiveness of admissions as measured by US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 scores.Methods Net present values were calculated by using results of the 2019 Doximity Physician Compensation report, a survey of 90,000 physicians. Mean USMLE Step 1 scores for matched US allopathic seniors in the 2018 National Resident Matching Program were used as a measure of clinical specialties{\textquoteright} competitiveness of admissions. We calculated a composite measure of net present value and annual work-hours by dividing each specialty{\textquoteright}s net present value by the reported average number of hours worked per year.Results In our analysis, orthopedic surgery had the highest net present value ($10,308,868), whereas family medicine had the lowest net present value ($5,274,546). Dermatology and plastic surgery had the highest mean USMLE Step 1 scores (249 for both), whereas family medicine had the lowest (220). Clinical specialties{\textquoteright} net present values were positively associated with mean USMLE Step 1 scores (Pearson{\textquoteright}s r=0.82; p\<.001).Conclusion and Relevance In this study, we describe associations suggesting that medical students choose clinical specialties as rational economic agents and that these decisions are mediated by USMLE Step 1 scores. This underscores the importance of titrating and aligning economic incentives to improve the allocation of medical students into clinical specialtiesCompeting Interest StatementDr. Landman reports previously investing in Picmonic.Funding StatementThis study was not externally supported.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available upon request https://blog.doximity.com/articles/doximity-2019-physician-compensation-report-d0ca91d1-3cf1-4cbb-b403-a49b9ffa849f NPVnet present valueNRMPNational Resident Matching ProgramPGYpostgraduate yearUSMLEUS Medical Licensing Examination}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/18/2020.03.14.20036087}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/18/2020.03.14.20036087.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }