RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Building Blocks for Integrating Image Analysis Algorithms into a Clinical Workflow
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.03.06.20027367
DO 10.1101/2020.03.06.20027367
A1 Krishna Juluru
A1 Hao-Hsin Shih
A1 Pierre Elnajjar
A1 Amin El-Rowmeim
A1 Josef Fox
A1 Eliot Siegel
A1 Krishna Nand Keshava Murthy
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/10/2020.03.06.20027367.abstract
AB Purpose Starting from a broad-based needs assessment and utilizing an image analysis algorithm (IAA) developed at our institution, the purpose of this study was to define generalizable building blocks necessary for the integration of any IAA into a clinical practice.Methods An IAA was developed in our institution to process lymphoscintigraphy exams. A team of radiologists defined a set of building blocks for integration of this IAA into clinical workflow. The building blocks served the following roles: (1) Timely delivery of images to the IAA, (2) quality control, (3) IAA results processing, (4) results presentation & delivery, (5) IAA error correction, (6) system performance monitoring, and (7) active learning. Utilizing these modules, the lymphoscintigraphy IAA was integrated into the clinical workflow at our institution. System performance was tested over a 1 month period, including assessment of number of exams processed and delivered, and error rates and corrections.Results From June 26-July 27, 2019, the building blocks were used to integrate IAA results from 132 lymphoscintigraphy exams into the clinical workflow, representing 100% of the exams performed during the time period. The system enabled radiologists to correct 21 of the IAA results. All results and corrections were successfully stored in a database. A dashboard allowed the development team to monitor system performance in real-time.Conclusions We describe seven building blocks that optimize the integration of IAAs into clinical workflow. The implementation of these building blocks in this study can be used to inform development of more robust, standards-based solutions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded in part through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesN/A