PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Rotenberg, Sara
AU  - Ryan, Sara
AU  - Ziebland, Sue
AU  - Ganle, John
TI  - Participant perceptions of disability training for health workers: a qualitative study in Ghana
AID  - 10.1101/2023.11.26.23299018
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.11.26.23299018
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/28/2023.11.26.23299018.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/11/28/2023.11.26.23299018.full
AB  - Introduction Disabled people often report poor treatment by health workers, and health workers often report wanting more training about how to care for disabled people. However, existing disability training for health workers is usually delivered in one-off interventions, with little follow-up, evaluation, and focus on long-term learning. This insufficiency makes it important to understand how disability training for health workers can be more effective. Therefore, we interviewed stakeholders involved in an existing disability training intervention in Ghana to understand how disability training for health workers could be improved.Methods In-depth, qualitative interviews were conducted with 33 people involved in disability training (either as trainers or trainees) in Ghana. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.Results Participants spoke about the challenges with existing training, namely how the current approach was insufficient, the consequences of informality in running training and the need for more sign language instruction. Several participants suggested improvements for training, including having external motivation (i.e., professional development credits, monetary benefits, etc.), more collaborative initiatives across institutions and government, and curriculum integration. We developed a theory of change model to show how different components of disability training support learning.Discussion These results show that disability training for health workers is important and that there is scope to refine and standardize training. In particular, the findings demonstrate how future initiatives to train health workers can be developed and implemented. They also emphasize the need to solicit perspectives from individuals who have experienced training in order to improve future iterations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementSR acknowledges generous funding from the Rhodes Trust, the Murray Speight Research Grant, and Wallace Watson Career Scholarship at St Catherine's College for their support of this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OxTREC Reference: 534-22) at the University of Oxford and the Ghana Health Service Ethics Review Committee (Reference: GHS-ERC 005/12/22).I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors