RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Systematic Review of effect of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Cognition Impairment after a Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.03.06.20032243
DO 10.1101/2020.03.06.20032243
A1 Takatoshi Hara
A1 Aturan Shanmugalingam
A1 Amanda McIntyre
A1 Amer M. Burhan
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/08/2020.03.06.20032243.abstract
AB Background In recent years, the potential of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for therapeutic effects on cognitive functions has been explored for stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) populations.Methods All English articles from the following sources were searched from inception up to December 31, 2018: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO and CENTRAL. Randomized and prospective controlled trials, including cross-over studies, were included for analysis. Studies with at least five individuals post stroke or TBI, whereby at least five sessions of NIBS were provided and used standardized neuropsychological measurement of cognition, were included.Results A total of 17 studies met eligibility criteria which included 546 patients receiving either repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Sample sizes ranged 5-25 subjects per group. Seven studies used rTMS and ten studies used tDCS. Target symptoms included global cognition (n=8), memory (n=1), attention (n=1), and unilateral spatial neglect (USN) (n=7). Nine studies combined rehabilitation or additional therapy with NIBS. Six of ten studies showed significant improvement in attention, memory, working memory, and executive function. In the USN study, five of the seven studies had a significant improvement in the intervention group.Conclusions The effect of NIBS on executive functions including attention and memory post stroke or TBI yielded mixed results with variable stimulation parameters. A significant, consistent improvement was observed for USN post stroke or TBI. Future studies using advanced neurophysiological and neuroimaging tools to allow network-based approach to NIBS for cognitive symptoms post stroke or TBI are warranted.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Trialthis is a systematic review and was not a registered clinical trialFunding StatementThis research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit. As a Vanier scholar, Amanda McIntyre is supported by a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesall data are included in the manuscript