RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Brain Injury after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.02.19.20023184
DO 10.1101/2020.02.19.20023184
A1 Fan, Jiaqi
A1 Fang, Xian
A1 Liu, Chunhui
A1 Zhu, Gangjie
A1 Hou, Cody R.
A1 Jiang, Jubo
A1 Lin, Xinping
A1 Wang, Lihan
A1 He, Yuxin
A1 Zhu, Qifeng
A1 Ng, Stella
A1 Chen, Zexin
A1 Hu, Haitao
A1 Tse, Hungfat
A1 Liu, Xianbao
A1 Wang, Jian’an
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/03/03/2020.02.19.20023184.abstract
AB Backgrounds The risk of brain injury in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is currently unknown.Methods and Results A total of 204 consecutive severe aortic stenosis patients who underwent TAVR were enrolled. 83 (40.7%) patients were BAV patients and the other 121 patients were tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients. All patients received diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) at baseline, 2 to 7 days after TAVR. Mean ages (mean ± SD: 75.8 ± 6.7 years vs. 78.9 ± 6.6 years, p = 0.004) and STS scores (6.0 ± 3.7 vs. 7.1 ± 4.2, p = 0.044) of the BAV and TAV patients were significantly different, while the stroke rates (2.4% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.704) were comparable between two groups. BAV patients were associated with higher number of new lesions (5.69 ± 6.22 vs. 3.50 ± 4.16, p = 0.008), total lesion volume [median(interquartile range): 290(70-930) mm3 vs. 140(35-480) mm3, p = 0.008], and the volume per lesion [70.0(45.0-115.0) mm3 vs. 57.5(24.5-93.0) mm3, p = 0.037] in DW-MRI. Moreover, the proportion of patients with lesions larger than 1cm3 (28.6% vs. 10.9%, p = 0.005) and the number of new lesions in the middle cerebral arteries zone (1.46 ± 2.07 vs. 0.98 ± 1.84, p = 0.039) and intermediate zone between the anterior cerebral and middle cerebral arteries (ACA/MCA) (1.07 ± 1.68 vs. 0.50 ± 1.05, p = 0.007), and between the vertebral artery and basilar artery (VA/BA) (1.01 ± 1.35 vs. 0.77 ± 1.44, p = 0.033) were higher in BAV patients than in TAV patients.Conclusions BAV patients may encounter more severe brain injuries not only due to greater number of lesions but also due to larger lesion size, especially in the ACA/MCA, MCA and VA/BA lesions zone.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT02803294Funding StatementThe authors have no conflicts of interest to discloseAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript will be available after the manuscript published.