PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gao, Fengjie
AU  - He, Hairong
AU  - Yan, Bin
AU  - Yang, Jian
AU  - Fan, Yajuan
AU  - Zhao, Binbin
AU  - He, Xiaoyan
AU  - Ma, Qingyan
AU  - Li, Baijia
AU  - Gao, Yuan
AU  - Qian, Li
AU  - Yang, Zai
AU  - Chen, Ce
AU  - Chen, Yunchun
AU  - Gao, Chengge
AU  - Zhu, Feng
AU  - Wang, Wei
AU  - Ma, Xiancang
TI  - Efficacy and Acceptability Comparisons of Cognitive Behavior Therapy, Drugs, and Their Combination for Panic Disorder in Adults: a Network Meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2020.02.27.20028605
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2020.02.27.20028605
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/27/2020.02.27.20028605.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/27/2020.02.27.20028605.full
AB  - Objective To compare 22 oral drugs, cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), and their combination treatments for the acute treatment of adults with panic disorder in terms of remission rate and acceptability.Design Systematic review and network meta-analysisData sources PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases from their inception up to May 26, 2019.Study selection Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of any oral drugs, CBT, CBT combined with any drug, or placebo in the acute treatment of adults with panic disorder diagnosed according to standard operationalized criteria. The primary outcomes were efficacy (remission rate) and acceptability (treatment discontinuations due to any cause).Results We identified 6585 reports that included 68 full-text RCTs involving 11101 patients. In terms of efficacy, 13 (68%) of 19 interventions were associated with higher remission rates than those of for placebo, with ORs ranging from 2.1 (95% credible interval [CrI] = 1.1 to 4.0) for sertraline to 13 (CrI = 4.5 to 44) for CBT combined with any drug. Regarding acceptability, alprazolam, imipramine, and etizolam were associated with lower dropout rates, with ORs ranging from 0.23 (CrI = 0.15 to 0.33) for alprazolam to 0.076 (CrI = 0.0021 to 0.77) for etizolam. Most of the differences between the other interventions were unclear. In head-to-head analyses, CBT combined with any drug was more effective than the other interventions, but it was no associated with an improvement in acceptability (OR = 0.12 to 0.219).Conclusions CBT combined with any drug was more effective than the other interventions analyzed in this study. CBT alone did not differ significantly from other drugs alone. We found that most drugs are effective against panic disorder, but they exhibit different acceptability and tolerability profiles.What is already known on this topic Some randomized controlled trials indicated that combined therapy are more effective than drug alone or cognitive behavior therapy alone. Nevertheless, drug monotherapy, cognitive behavior therapy, and combination therapy had never been compared in a comprehensive network meta-analysis. With this evidence gap remaining, the availability of reliable evidence of the relative merits of multiple interventions is essential to ensuring that clinicians choose the best option for each individual patient.What this study adds This network meta-analysis is the first to evaluate the relative merits of cognitive behavior therapy, cognitive behavior therapy combined with any drug, and 22 oral drugs in the field of panic disorder. The results showed a significant higher remission rates for cognitive behavior therapy combined with any drug than those of the other interventions. Cognitive behavior therapy alone was superior to placebo but did not differ significantly from other active drugs. Additionally, paroxetine, venlafaxine, fluoxetine, sertraline, and clonazepam are more recommendable than the other drugs based on their remission rates, scores on panic-symptoms scales, and acceptability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81771471), and the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, China (No.XJTU1AF-CRF-2016-024).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are available from corespondence author.