PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Andrew A Plumb AU - Anu E Obaro AU - Paul Bassett AU - Rachel Baldwin-Cleland AU - Steve Halligan AU - David Burling TI - Performance and evaluation in computed tomographic colonography screening: protocol for a cluster randomised trial AID - 10.1101/2020.02.25.20027714 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.02.25.20027714 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/27/2020.02.25.20027714.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/27/2020.02.25.20027714.full AB - Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common, important healthcare priority and improving patient outcome relies on early diagnosis. Colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography (CTC) are commonly-used diagnostic tests. Although colonoscopists are highly regulated and must be accredited, no analogous process exists for CTC. There are currently no universally accepted radiologist performance indicators for CTC, and lack of regulatory oversight may lead to variability in quality and lower neoplasia detection rates. This study aims to determine whether a structured educational training and feedback programme can improve radiologist interpretation accuracy.Methods NHS England CTC reporting radiologists will be cluster randomised to either an intervention (one-day individualised training and assessment with feedback) or control (assessment with no training or feedback) arm. Each cluster represents radiologists reporting CTC in a single NHS site. Both the intervention and control arm will undertake four CTC assessments at baseline, 1-month (after training; intervention arm or enrolment; control arm), 6- and 12 months to assess their detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and 6mm+ polyps. The primary outcome will be difference in sensitivity at the 1-month test between arms. Secondary outcomes will include sensitivity at 6 and 12 months and radiologist characteristics associated with improved performance. Multilevel logistic regression will be used to analyse per-polyp and per-case sensitivity. Local ethical and Health Research Authority approval have been obtained.Discussion Lack of infrastructure to ensure that CTC radiologists can report adequately and lack of consensus regarding appropriate quality metrics may lead to variability in performance. Our provision of a structured education programme with feedback will evaluate the impact of individualised training and identify the factors related to improved radiologist performance in CTC reporting. An improvement in performance could lead to increased neoplasia detection and better patient outcome.Registration Clinical Trials (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02892721); available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02892721. NIHR Clinical Research Network (CPMS ID 32293).Competing Interest StatementSH Provides non-remunerated research and development advice for iCAD inc. No other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.Clinical TrialNCT02892721Funding StatementFunding: 40tude curing colon cancer, the Edith Murphy Foundation, The Peter Stebbings Memorial Charity, and Public Health England (funds administered by the St Mark’s Hospital Foundation). Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets during and/or analysed during the current study will not be made publicly available.