PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Gerard Encina-Llamas AU - Torsten Dau AU - Bastian Epp TI - Can Envelope Following Responses Be Used to Estimate Level Compression in the Auditory System? AID - 10.1101/2020.02.19.20024919 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.02.19.20024919 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/23/2020.02.19.20024919.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/23/2020.02.19.20024919.full AB - The ability to compress the large level range of incoming sounds into a smaller range of vibration amplitudes on the basilar membrane (BM) is an important property of the healthy auditory system. Sensorineural hearing impairment typically leads to a decrease in sensitivity to sound and a reduction of the amount of compression observed in BM input-output functions. While sensitivity loss can be measured efficiently via audiometry, no measure has yet been provided that represents fast and reliable compression estimates in the individual listener. In the present study, magnitude-level functions obtained from envelope following responses (EFR) to four simultaneously presented amplitude modulated tones were measured in normal-hearing (NH) and sensorineural hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. The slope of part of the EFR magnitude-level function was used to estimate level compression. The median values of the compression estimates in the group of NH listeners were found to be consistent with previously reported group-averaged compression estimates based on psychoacoustical measures and group-averaged distortion-product otoacoustic emission magnitude-level functions in human listeners, and similar to BM compression values measured invasively in non-human mammals. The EFR magnitude-level functions for the HI listeners were less compressive than those for the NH listeners, consistent with a reduction of BM compression in HI listeners. A computer model of the auditory nerve (AN) was used to simulate EFR magnitude-level functions at the level of the AN. The recorded EFRs at the chosen amplitude modulation rates (81-98 Hz) were considered to represent neural activity originating from the auditory brainstem and midbrain rather than a direct measure of AN activity. Nonetheless, the AN model simulations could account for the main trends observed in the recorded data. The model simulations suggested that the growth of the EFR magnitude-level function is highly influenced by contributions from off-frequency neural populations, which compromises the possibility to estimate local (i.e., frequency specific) compression with EFRs. Furthermore, the model showed that while the slope of the EFR magnitude-level function is sensitive to the loss of compression observed in HI listeners due to outer hair cell dysfunction, it is also sensitive to inner hair cell dysfunction. Overall, it is concluded that EFR magnitude-level functions do not represent frequency specific level compression in the auditory system.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Oticon Centre of Excellence for Hearing and Speech Sciences (CHeSS) and the Novo Nordisk Foundation grant NNF17OC0027872 at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data reported in this article are publicly available in a Zenodo repository. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.844833