RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Early evaluation of transmission control measures in response to the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in China
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.01.30.20019844
DO 10.1101/2020.01.30.20019844
A1 Huaiyu Tian
A1 Yonghong Liu
A1 Yidan Li
A1 Moritz U.G. Kraemer
A1 Bin Chen
A1 Chieh-Hsi Wu
A1 Jun Cai
A1 Bingying Li
A1 Bo Xu
A1 Qiqi Yang
A1 Ben Wang
A1 Peng Yang
A1 Yujun Cui
A1 Yimeng Song
A1 Pai Zheng
A1 Quanyi Wang
A1 Ottar N. Bjornstad
A1 Ruifu Yang
A1 Bryan T. Grenfell
A1 Oliver G. Pybus
A1 Christopher Dye
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/18/2020.01.30.20019844.abstract
AB Background An ongoing outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was first reported in December 2019 in Wuhan city, Hubei Province, and has spread throughout China and to other countries. On 23 January 2020, in an attempt to contain the epidemic, non-essential travel was prohibited in and out of Wuhan city, a major transport hub and conurbation of 11 million people. Since then China has implemented nationwide its highest level (Level 1) of emergency response to further contain the spread of infection within and among cities.Methods We used generalized linear regression models to investigate the effect of the type and timing of transmission control measures on the spread of COVID-19 from Wuhan city, and on the growth of the epidemic in 296 other cities across China. In addition to the Wuhan city shutdown, as part of the emergency response, entertainment venues were closed, public gatherings banned, intra-city public transport (bus and subway rail) suspended, and travel to and from other cities prohibited.Findings The Wuhan city travel ban slowed the dispersal of infection to other cities by an estimated 2.91 days (95% CI: 2.54-3.29) on average. Among the other urban centres across mainland China, cities that implemented control measures pre-emptively, before the first case was reported, had 37% fewer cases in the week following the first reported case (13.0, 95%CI 7.1-18.8) compared with cities starting control after the first case (20.6, 95%CI: 14.5-26.8). Among individual control measures investigated, the most effective were suspending intra-city public transport, and closing entertainment venues and banning public gatherings.Interpretation The implementation of transmission control measures slowed the dispersal of infection from its origin in Wuhan city and reduced the numbers of cases reported during the early stages of the epidemic in hundreds of other Chinese cities.Evidence before the study We searched PubMed and preprint servers (medRxiv) using the terms “coronavirus”, “outbreak” and “intervention” regardless of language and date. 551 of the 571 results were unrelated to public health (“nonpharmaceutical interventions”). 13 studies of the remaining 20 studies used mathematical modelling to simulate the outbreak under various intervention scenarios; 5 were empirical analyses investigating the effect of interventions on disease in one or more cities, including the effect of traffic restrictions, school closure and influenza on the incidence of COVID-19. Two other papers evaluated the effect of transmission control measures in multiple cities on the 1918–19 influenza pandemic.Added value of this study Our study is among the first study to evaluate the effects of an unprecedented, large-scale attempt to contain a rapidly-spreading, novel viral disease (COVID-19), including shutdown of the city of origin (Wuhan, 11 million inhabitants), followed by the closure of entertainment venues, the banning of public gatherings, the suspension of within-city public transport, and prohibition of travel to and from other cities across China. The results are derived from a large, newly compiled and geocoded repository of population and epidemiological data relevant to COVID-19.Implications of all the available evidence Transmission control measures slowed the dispersal of COVID-19 from Wuhan city and reduced case numbers in hundreds of other cities as they became infected. All control measures appeared to reduce case numbers but the most effective were suspending public transport, closing entertainment venues and banning public gatherings. This analysis will help to inform the response to the epidemic in China and in other affected countries around the world.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this study was provided by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JQ18025); Beijing Advanced Innovation Program for Land Surface Science; National Natural Science Foundation of China (81673234); Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS)(2018QNRC001)Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesPopulation sizes for each city were collected from the China City Statistical Yearbook (http://olap.epsnet.com.cn/).Human movement can be observed directly from mobile phone data, through the location-based services (LBS) employed by popular Tencent applications, such as WeChat and QQ. Average movement outflows from Wuhan City to other cities, by air, train, and road, were calculatedfrom the migration flows database (https://heat.qq.com/) over the entire 2018.