TY - JOUR T1 - Going off the rails: Impaired coherence in the speech of patients with semantic control deficits JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.02.10.20020685 SP - 2020.02.10.20020685 AU - Paul Hoffman AU - Lucy Cogdell-Brooke AU - Hannah E Thompson Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/11/2020.02.10.20020685.abstract N2 - The ability to speak coherently, maintaining focus on the topic at hand, is critical for effective communication and is commonly impaired following brain damage. Recent data suggests that executive processes that regulate access to semantic knowledge (i.e., semantic control) are critical for maintaining coherence during speech. To test this hypothesis, we assessed speech coherence in a case-series of fluent stroke aphasic patients with deficits in semantic control. Patients were asked to speak about a series of topics and their responses were analysed using computational linguistic methods to derive measures of their global coherence (the degree to which they spoke about the topic given) and local coherence (the degree to which they maintained a topic from one moment to the next). Compared with age-matched controls, patients showed severe impairments to global coherence and milder impairments to local coherence, suggesting that semantic control deficits give rise to being “led up the garden path”, i.e., one sentence automatically cueing another, with the topic becoming increasingly less relevant to the original question. Global coherence was strongly correlated with the patients’ performance on tests of semantic control, with poorer ability to maintain top-down global coherence being associated with greater semantic control deficits. Other aspects of speech production were also impaired but were not correlated with semantic control deficits. This is the first study to investigate the impact of semantic control impairments within a naturalistic setting, and indicates patients with these impairments are likely to find maintaining focus in everyday conversation difficult.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPH was supported by The University of Edinburgh Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, part of the cross council Lifelong Health and Wellbeing Initiative (MR/K026992/1). Funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) is gratefully acknowledged. H.E.T. received support from the Wellcome Trust [ref: 105624] through the Centre for Chronic Diseases and Disorders (C2D2) at the University of York.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data reported in this paper are available at https://osf.io/cvuqz/ ER -