RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Making the urban environment around schools healthier, developing an initial programme theory: an early realist process evaluation of the London superzones pilot
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.02.04.20020396
DO 10.1101/2020.02.04.20020396
A1 Heather Catt
A1 Steven L Senior
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/06/2020.02.04.20020396.abstract
AB BACKGROUND More than four out of five people in England live in an urban area so the urban environment is an important determinant of health and an important contributor to health inequalities. This is especially true for children, for whom the impacts of their local environment may have lifelong effects. To improve the health effects of the urban environment the London Devolution Partnership piloted multi-agency partnerships focusing on 400m ‘superzones’ around schools in deprived communities. The intention is for local partners to work together to make the environment within the superzone healthier.METHODS A realist process evaluation of 13 pilot sites. We used data from programme documents, a rapid literature search, and interviews with lead officers for the 13 local authorities that took part in the programme. Qualitative analysis was used to identify combinations of context, mechanisms, and outcomes (CMOs) that affected the creation of a local partnership and plan.RESULTS All but one of the 13 pilot sites established a superzone and multi-agency action plan. We identified 12 CMOs that affect the process of creating a school superzone. We present a logic model that describes how these CMOs combine to make up an initial programme theory of superzones. Key aspects of this programme theory include the importance of local partners’ priorities, leadership and support from across the local authority, and the flexibility of the model itself.CONCLUSION The superzones model is an emerging framework for local place-based partnership working to improve the urban environment. However, the success of the model is likely to depend on local context. The evidence presented here could guide the further roll out of the model, and support those local authorities that want to create superzones.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this work. Expenses associated with the research were covered by the Division of Population Health, Primary Care, and Health Services Research, University of Manchester.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used are qualitative and to protect participants privacy, raw transcripts are not available