%0 Journal Article %A Makoto Mori %A Cornell Brooks II %A Erica Spatz %A Bobak J Mortazavi %A Sanket S. Dhruva %A George C. Linderman %A Lawrence A. Grab %A Yawei Zhang %A Arnar Geirsson %A Sarwat I. Chaudhry %A Harlan M. Krumholz %T Protocol for Project Recovery: Cardiac Surgery - Leveraging Digital Platform for Efficient Collection of Longitudinal Patient-Reported Outcome Data Towards Improving Postoperative Recovery %D 2020 %R 10.1101/2020.01.12.20017269 %J medRxiv %P 2020.01.12.20017269 %X Introduction Improving postoperative patient recovery after cardiac surgery is a priority, but our current understanding of individual variations in recovery and factors associated with poor recovery is limited. We are using a health-information exchange platform to collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and wearable device data to phenotype recovery patterns in the 30-day period after cardiac surgery hospital discharge, to identify factors associated with these phenotypes and to investigate phenotype associations with clinical outcomes.Methods and analysis We designed a prospective cohort study to enroll 200 patients undergoing valve, coronary artery bypass graft, or aortic surgery at a tertiary center in the U.S. We are enrolling patients postoperatively after the intensive care unit (ICU) discharge, and delivering electronic surveys directly to patients every 3 days for 30 days after hospital discharge. We will conduct medical record reviews to collect patient demographics, comorbidity, operative details and hospital course using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data definitions. We will use phone interview and medical record review data for adjudication of survival, readmission, and complications. We will apply group-based trajectory modeling to the time-series PROM and device data to classify patients into distinct categories of recovery trajectories. We will evaluate whether certain recovery pattern predicts death or hospital readmissions, as well as whether clinical factors predict a patient having poor recovery trajectories. We will evaluate whether early recovery patterns predict the overall trajectory at the patient-level.Ethics and dissemination The Yale Institutional Review Board approved this study. Following the description of the study procedure, we obtain written informed consent from all study participants. The consent form states that all personal information, survey response, and any medical records are confidential, will not be shared, and are stored in an encrypted database.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis study will assess the patient perspective on recovery after cardiac surgery at a high frequency within the 30-day postoperative period with surveys and activity monitoring via a health information platform and wearable devices.Using longitudinal patient-reported outcomes measure (PROM) data, this study will define recovery patterns and factors associated with different recovery trajectories and guide the development interventions to improve recovery and support expansion of the study to additional sites.The study is single center and the sample size is limited.Competing Interest StatementDr. Chaudhry is a paid reviewer for the CVS Caremark State of CT Clinical Pharmacy Program. Dr. Mortazavi is supported in part by the Center for Remote Health Technologies and Systems and Texas A&M University, as well as awards 1R01EB028106-01 and 1R21EB028486-01 from the National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) for work employing machine learning on health data. Dr. Mortazavi reported having a patent US10201746B1 approved for "Near-realistic sports motion analysis and activity monitoring" and a patent to US20180315507A1 is pending. Dr. Krumholz works under contract with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to support quality measurement programs; was a recipient of a research grant, through Yale, from Medtronic and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to develop methods for post-market surveillance of medical devices; was a recipient of a research grant with Medtronic and is the recipient of a research grant from Johnson & Johnson, through Yale University, to support clinical trial data sharing; was a recipient of a research agreement, through Yale University, from the Shenzhen Center for Health Information for work to advance intelligent disease prevention and health promotion; collaborates with the National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases in Beijing; receives payment from the Arnold & Porter Law Firm for work related to the Sanofi clopidogrel litigation, from the Ben C. Martin Law Firm for work related to the Cook Celect IVC filter litigation, and from the Siegfried and Jensen Law Firm for work related to Vioxx litigation; chairs a Cardiac Scientific Advisory Board for UnitedHealth; was a participant/participant representative of the IBM Watson Health Life Sciences Board; is a member of the Advisory Board for Element Science, the Advisory Board for Facebook, and the Physician Advisory Board for Aetna; and is the co-founder of HugoHealth, a personal health information platform, and co-founder of Refactor Health, an enterprise healthcare AI-augmented data management company.Funding StatementThis publication was made possible by K12HL138046 by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award, grant UL1TR001863, from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science, a component of the NIH.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a study protocol article and the data are not available. %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2020/01/16/2020.01.12.20017269.full.pdf