RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 What does it mean to use the mean? The impact of different data handling strategies on the proportion of children classified as meeting 24-hr movement guidelines and associations with overweight and obesity
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.09.22.23295801
DO 10.1101/2023.09.22.23295801
A1 Pfledderer, Christopher D.
A1 Burkart, Sarah
A1 Dugger, Roddrick
A1 Parker, Hannah
A1 von Klinggraeff, Lauren
A1 Okely, Anthony D.
A1 Weaver, R. Glenn
A1 Beets, Michael W.
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/10/09/2023.09.22.23295801.abstract
AB Background Despite the widespread endorsement of 24-hour movement guidelines (physical activity, sleep, screentime) for youth, no standardized processes for categorizing guideline achievement exists. The purpose of this study was to illustrate the impact of different data handling strategies on the proportion of children meeting 24-hour movement guidelines (24hrG) and associations with overweight and obesity.Methods A subset of 524 children (ages 5-12yrs) with complete 24-hour behavior measures on at least 10 days was used to compare the impact of data handling strategies on estimates of meeting 24hrG. Physical activity and sleep were measured via accelerometry. Screentime was measured via parent self-report. Comparison of meeting 24hrG were made using 1) average of behaviors across all days (AVG-24hr), 2) classifying each day and evaluating the percentage meeting 24hrG from 10-100% of their measured days (DAYS-24hr), and 3) the average of a random sample of 4 days across 10 iterations (RAND-24hr). A second subset of children (N=475) with height and weight data was used to explore the influence of each data handling strategy on children meeting guidelines and the odds of overweight/obesity via logistic regression.Results Classification for AVG-24hr resulted in 14.7% of participants meeting 24hrG. Classification for DAYS-24hr resulted in 63.5% meeting 24hrG on 10% of measured days with <1% meeting 24hrG on 100% of days. Classification for RAND-24hr resulted in 15.9% of participants meeting 24hrG. Across 10 iterations, 63.6% of participants never met 24hrG regardless of the days sampled, 3.4% always met 24hrG, with the remaining 33.0% classified as meeting 24hrG for at least one of the 10 random iterations of days. Using AVG-24hr as a strategy, meeting all three guidelines associated with lower odds of having overweight obesity (OR=0.38, p<0.05). The RAND-24hr strategy produced a range of odds from 0.27 to 0.56. Using the criteria of needing to meet 24hrG on 100% of days, meeting all three guidelines associated with the lowest odds of having overweight and obesity as well (OR=0.04, p<0.05).Conclusions Varying estimates of meeting the 24hrG and the odds of overweight and obesity results from different data handling strategies and days sampled.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive And Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01DK116665 (PI Beets), by the by The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award, F31HL158016 (von Klinggraeff), F32HL154530 (Burkart), and by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development under award F31HD102045 (Dugger), as well as by the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number P20GM130420 for the Research Center for Child Well-Being. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All procedures were approved by the University of South Carolina's Institutional Review Board prior to the start of the study (IRB#Pro00080382) and participant consent was obtained prior to being enrolled in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.Yes24hrG24-hour movement behavior guidelinesAVG-24hrData handling strategy in which estimates were averaged across the entire measurement periodDAYS-24hrData handling strategy in which each individual day was classified as meeting/not meeting guidelinesMVPAModerate to Vigorous Physical ActivityPAPhysical ActivityRAND-24hrData handling strategy in which a random sample of four days was used to classify guideline adherence across 10 iterations.