RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The ocrelizumab phase II extension trial suggests the potential to improve the risk:benefit balance in multiple sclerosis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.01.09.20016774
DO 10.1101/2020.01.09.20016774
A1 David Baker
A1 Gareth Pryce
A1 Louisa K. James
A1 Monica Marta
A1 Klaus Schmierer
YR 2020
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/14/2020.01.09.20016774.abstract
AB Objective Ocrelizumab inhibits relapsing multiple sclerosis when administered every six months. Based on potential similar memory B cell depletion mechanisms with cladribine and alemtuzumab, we hypothesised that CD20-depletion of B cells by ocrelizumab may exhibit a duration of response exceeding the current licenced treatment interval.Methods Internet-located information from regulatory submissions and meeting reports relating to the unpublished open-label, phase II ocrelizumab extension trial (NCT00676715) were reviewed. This followed people (54-55/arm) with MS, who switched from placebo or interferon-beta to ocrelizumab for three 600mg treatment cycles (week 24, 48, 72) or people treated with ocrelizumab for four 600mg treatment cycles (week 0-72), followed by an 18 month treatment-free period.Results CD19+ B cells were rapidly depleted within 2 weeks and slow CD19+ B cell repopulation began about 6 months after the last infusion with median-repletion of over 15 months. The reduced annualized relapse rate during the published efficacy study appeared to be maintained in the extension study and there were no new T1 gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions detected in the treatment-free period. Importantly, within these extension cohorts, there appeared to be fewer adverse events and infections events.Conclusions Ocrelizumab appears to induce durable relapsing disease inhibition, within 3 treatment cycles Therefore, it may be possible to reduce the frequency of dosing to maintain efficacy, whilst limiting infection and other risks associated with continuous immunosuppression. Further studies are now clearly required to determine whether this data is robust, as few people seemed to complete the study.Competing Interest StatementDB, MM and KS have received compensation for either consultancies and presentations and advisory board activities from Roche. However, Roche/Genentech were not involved in the decision to write and submit this manuscript. GP and LKJ have nothing to disclose. DB has received compensation for activities related to Canbex therapeutics, Japan tobacco, Merck, Novartis. MM has received speaking honoraria from Sanofi-Genzyme. KS has received compensation for activities related to Biogen, Lipomed, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and TevaClinical TrialNCT00676715Clinical Protocols https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2007-006338-32/IT Funding StatementThis received study received no fundingAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is not applicable