TY - JOUR T1 - Beyond T Staging in the Treat All Era: Capturing the Severity and Heterogeneity of Kaposi’s Sarcoma in East Africa JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.01.04.20016519 SP - 2020.01.04.20016519 AU - Esther E. Freeman AU - Devon E. McMahon AU - Aggrey Semeere AU - Helen Byakwaga AU - Miriam Laker-Oketta AU - Megan Wenger AU - Charles Kasozi AU - Matthew Semakadde AU - Mwebesa Bwana AU - Michael Kanyesigye AU - Philippa Kadama-Makanga AU - Elyne Rotich AU - Job Kisuya AU - Kara Wools-Kaloustian AU - Ingrid Bassett AU - Naftali Busakhala AU - Jeffrey Martin Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/10/2020.01.04.20016519.abstract N2 - Background In the treat-all era of HIV, Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) remains one of the most incident cancers in sub-Saharan Africa. The majority of patients with KS are diagnosed at advanced disease stage in this setting. Staging systems for KS, specifically the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) system, were developed in the pre-ART era, were not meant to guide treatment, and may not fully capture the clinical heterogeneity of advanced disease. There is no international consensus on which KS patients need chemotherapy in addition to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Understanding KS severity of disease in the current era would help to inform prognosis and clarify treatment guidelines.Methods We performed rapid case ascertainment (RCA) on people living with HIV ≥18 years old newly diagnosed with biopsy-proven KS from 2016 to 2019 at three clinic sites in Kenya and Uganda. As close as possible to time of diagnosis, we performed a structured interview, physical examination, and collection of laboratory specimens. We reported KS severity using ACTG and WHO staging criteria, as well as detailed measurements not captured in current staging systems.Results We enrolled 264 adults newly diagnosed with KS. RCA was performed within 1 month of KS diagnosis for 62% of patients and within 6 months for 73% of patients. Patients were 61% Kenyan, 69% male, and with a median age of 35. Median CD4 count was 239 (IQR 87 to 408), with 72% of patients initiating ART greater than 60 days prior to diagnosis. The majority of patients had advanced stage of disease, with 82% qualifying as ACTG T1 and 64% as WHO Severe/Symptomatic KS. There was marked heterogeneity within advanced KS, with 25% of patients having two ACTG qualifiers and 3% of patients had three or more ACTG qualifiers.Conclusion The majority of patients with KS in this study had advanced stage disease at time of diagnosis, highlighting the need to improve early diagnosis of KS. Within this group of advanced stage patients was large clinical heterogeneity, leading to questions about whether all patients with advanced KS require the same treatment strategy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementResearch reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in accordance with the regulatory requirements of the National Institutes of Health under Award Numbers U01AI069911 (East Africa IeDEA Consortium), K23 AI136579, K24 AI141036, and U54 CA190153 and the Dermatology Foundation Career Development Award (Freeman). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, or Harvard University.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is stored on Dropbox.com and a de-identified version can be provided on request. ER -