PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jeremy Charles Morse AU - Craig William Brown TI - Interprofessional Learning in Immediate Life Support training improves simulated patient related outcomes AID - 10.1101/2019.12.31.19016170 DP - 2020 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2019.12.31.19016170 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/02/2019.12.31.19016170.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2020/01/02/2019.12.31.19016170.full AB - Aim of the study To assess team performance in implementing time critical key interventions during a simulated resuscitation after participating in either an interprofessional-learning (IPL) or uniprofessional-learning (UPL) Immediate Life Support training course (ILS).Introduction Much of the published work on team-based simulation training has measured the lower levels of Kirkpatrick’s hierarchy of evidence and effectiveness. This study aimed to ascertain if interprofessional team training could improve a higher level of outcome such as behaviour and patient outcomes.Methods A retrospective quantitative analysis of time critical points in a simulated cardiac arrest resuscitation, from a previous randomised study on the effects of Interprofessional Learning in ILS. The video recordings from the original study consisting of medical (n=48) and nursing (n=48) were analysed to mark when either the IPL or UPL team performed a time critical intervention.Results Five time-critical points for interventions were identified; confirmation of cardiac arrest, commencement of initial CPR, rhythm check, time to 1st shock and delay in restarting CPR. Parametric testing of each of these time-based criteria were subjected to an independent sample t-test with statistically significant findings in three of the five criteria in favour of those who had undertaken the interprofessional learning.Conclusion Our results demonstrate that through an IPL approach in ILS there was a statistically different improvement in mean times to performing time-critical interventions, which if transferred to the clinical environment could improve and impact on both change of behaviour and patient outcomes in Kirkpatrick’s higher levels of evidence and effectiveness.Though this study shows that team behaviour and performing time-critical interventions can improve in the short-term, we acknowledge that further longitudinal studies are required to ascertain the effect of such improvement over time. So that both as researchers and educators we can make healthcare teams work safer and more efficiently to improve patient outcomes.What is already known Like simulation, intuitively we know that Interprofessional Learning and Team training should make a difference to clinical practice for those involved. The majority of research reported, is measured at the lower levels of Kirkpatrick’s hierarchy. This retrospective video analysis of a previous study aimed to look at the functioning between interprofessionally and uni-professionally trained teams in performing time-critical interventions in a simulated cardiac arrest.What this study adds Our study suggests that the use of Interprofessional Learning in resuscitation training does have an effect on performance during the management of a simulated cardiac arrest which could improve and impact on both change of behaviour and patient outcomes in Kirkpatrick’s higher levels of evidence and effectiveness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding for the completion of this studyAuthor DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are available on reasonable request