TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Evaluation of CHROMagar COL-<em>APSE</em>, MicroScan® Walkaway, ComASP™Colistin, and Colistin MAC Test in Detecting Colistin-resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2019.12.17.19015156 SP - 2019.12.17.19015156 AU - Arnold Karabo Sephofane AU - Nontombi Mbelle AU - John Osei Sekyere Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/19/2019.12.17.19015156.abstract N2 - Background Colistin has become a critical antibiotic for fatal Gram-negative infections owing to the proliferation of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Thus, cheaper, faster, efficient and easier-to-use colistin diagnostics are required for clinical surveillance, diagnoses and therapeutics.Methods The sensitivity, specificity, major error (ME), very major error (VME), categorial agreement, essential agreement, turnaround time (TAT), average cost, and required skill for four colistin resistance diagnostics viz., CHROMagar COL-APSE, ComASP™Colistin, MicroScan®, and Colistin MAC Test (CMT) were evaluated against broth microdilution (BMD) using 84 Gram-negative bacterial isolates. A multiplex PCR (M-PCR) was used to screen all isolates to detect the presence of the mcr-1 to mcr-5 genes. A 15-point grading scale was used to grade the tests under skill, ease, processing time etc.Results mcr-1 was detected by both M-PCR and CMT in a single E. coli isolate. The sensitivity and specificity of CHROMagar COL-APSE, MicroScan®, and ComASP™Colistin, were 82.05% and 66.67%, 92.31% and 76.92%, and 100% and 88.89% respectively. The MicroScan® was the most expensive at a cost (per sampe tested) of R221.6 ($15.0), followed by CHROMagar COL-APSE (R118.3; $8.0), M-PCR (R75.1; $5.1), CMT (R20.1; $1.4) and ComASP™Colistin (R2.64; $0.2). CHROMagar was the easiest to perform, followed by ComASP™Colistin, M-PCR, MicroScan®, CMT and BMD whilst M-PCR and MicroScan required higher skill.Conclusions The ComASP™Colistin was the best performing diagnostic test, with low VME and ME, making it recommendable for routine colistin sensitivity testing in clinical laboratories; particularly, in poorer settings. It is however limited by a TAT of 18-24 hours.Highlights✓ The diagnostic efficiencies, cost, required skill and ease-of-use of colistin-resistance diagnostics were evaluated against the broth microdilution✓ The ComASP™ was most sensitive, less skill-requiring and cheap✓ The CHROMagar COL-APSE was easiest to perform, albeit expensive and less sensitive✓ The MicroScan was most expensive, requires advanced skills and was very sensitive, particularly for Enterobacteriaceae without E. cloacae and Salmonella.✓ The Colistin MAC test is a better PCR alternative for detecting mcr producers in low-resource settingsCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the University of Pretoria and the National Health Laboratory Services (NHLS)Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data are included in this article ER -