PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Riccardo Miotto
AU  - Bethany L. Percha
AU  - Benjamin S. Glicksberg
AU  - Hao-Chih Lee
AU  - Lisanne Cruz
AU  - Joel T. Dudley
AU  - Ismail Nabeel
TI  - Identifying Acute Low Back Pain Episodes in Primary Care Practice from Clinical Notes
AID  - 10.1101/19010462
DP  - 2019 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 19010462
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/18/19010462.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/18/19010462.full
AB  - Background Acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) are different conditions with different treatments. However, they are coded in electronic health records with the same ICD-10 code (M54.5) and can be differentiated only by retrospective chart reviews. This prevents efficient definition of data-driven guidelines for billing and therapy recommendations, such as return-to-work options.Objective To solve this issue, we evaluate the feasibility of automatically distinguishing acute LBP episodes by analyzing free text clinical notes.Methods We used a dataset of 17,409 clinical notes from different primary care practices; of these, 891 documents were manually annotated as “acute LBP” and 2,973 were generally associated with LBP via the recorded ICD-10 code. We compared different supervised and unsupervised strategies for automated identification: keyword search; topic modeling; logistic regression with bag-of-n-grams and manual features; and deep learning (ConvNet). We trained the supervised models using either manual annotations or ICD-10 codes as positive labels.Results ConvNet trained using manual annotations obtained the best results with an AUC-ROC of 0.97 and F-score of 0.69. ConvNet’s results were also robust to reduction of the number of manually annotated documents. In the absence of manual annotations, topic models performed better than methods trained using ICD-10 codes, which were unsatisfactory for identifying LBP acuity.Conclusions This study uses clinical notes to delineate a potential path toward systematic learning of therapeutic strategies, billing guidelines, and management options for acute LBP at the point of care.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementI.N. and L.C. would like to thank the Pilot Projects Research Training Program of the NY and NJ Education and Research Center (ERC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, for their funding (grant # T42 OH 008422). R.M. would like to thank the support from the Hasso Plattner Foundation and a courtesy GPU donation from NVIDIA.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data used in this study is not publicly available.AUC-PRCArea Under the Precision-Recall CurveAUC-ROCArea Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic CurveBoNBag of N-gramsCNNConvolutional Neural NetworkEHRElectronic Health RecordHIPAAHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActICD-CMInternational Statistical of Diseases, Clinical ModificationIRBInstitutional Review BoardLBPLow Back PainLRLogistic RegressionNLPNatural Language ProcessingNYNew YorkPCPPrimary Care ProviderRTWReturn To WorkTF-IDFTerm Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency