RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Imagination exercises improve language in younger but not in older children with autism suggesting a strong critical period JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2019.12.10.19014159 DO 10.1101/2019.12.10.19014159 A1 Andrey Vyshedskiy A1 Edward Khokhlovich A1 Rita Dunn A1 Alexander Faisman A1 Jonah Elgart A1 Lisa Lokshina A1 Yuriy Gankin A1 Simone Ostrovsky A1 Lauren deTorres A1 Stephen M Edelson A1 Petr O Ilyinskii YR 2019 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/14/2019.12.10.19014159.abstract AB Based on a few cases of childhood traumatic aphasia and hemispherectomy, Lenneberg suggested a critical period for first language acquisition. Lenneberg’s ideas are still debated today and have never been tested in a large group of children. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) provides such an opportunity as language acquisition is a common problem in ASD. Here, we report data from a three-year-long observational trial of 8,766 children with ASD. We initiated this trial in order to test two hypotheses: 1) voluntary imagination is central to complex language and 2) there exists a strong critical period for voluntary imagination acquisition closing shortly after the age of 5. Accordingly, we developed imagination exercises (verbal and nonverbal), organized them into an application called Mental Imagery Therapy for Autism (MITA) and provided this MITA app gratis to children ages 2 to 12. MITA-experienced children (N=3,540) were matched to the ‘treatment-as-usual’ participants (TaU, N=5,226). Both younger (2-5 years of age) and older children (5-12 YOA) in MITA and TaU groups improved their language over time, but on an annualized basis, younger MITA children improved their language 3-fold faster than TaU group. There was no difference between MITA and TaU in the older children group. These findings support Lenneberg’s critical period hypothesis and indicate that acquisition of voluntary imagination is essential for the full language acquisition. Crucially, our results imply that the underlying plasticity dramatically diminishes after the age of five and therefore even greater therapeutic intervention should be targeting the very first years of a child’s life.Competing Interest StatementThis study was self-funded. AV, EK, POI, RD, AF, JE, LL, and YG are partners in ImagiRation limited liability partnership, the developer of MITA.Clinical TrialNCT02708290Funding StatementThis study was self-funded.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified raw data from this manuscript are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.