RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A Cognitive Development Chart for School-age Children and Adolescents
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19012963
DO 10.1101/19012963
A1 André R. Simioni
A1 Daniel S. Pine
A1 João R. Sato
A1 Pedro M. Pan
A1 Rochele Paz Fonseca
A1 Julia Schafer
A1 Euripedes C. Miguel
A1 Jair J. Mari
A1 Ary Gadelha
A1 Rodrigo A. Bressan
A1 Luis A. Rohde
A1 Giovanni A. Salum
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/27/19012963.abstract
AB Objective To evaluate the reliability and predictive utility of a time-efficient cognitive development chart that seeks to identify children and adolescents with high-risk for multiple outcomes such as mental health problems, substance use, and educational difficulties.Method We analyzed data from the Brazilian High-Risk Cohort for Psychiatric Disorders (HRC), a longitudinal school-based study conducted from 2010-2011 to 2013-2014. Participants were 2,239 children and adolescents, 6 to 17 years of age, who completed the cognitive assessment at baseline. The task used to track cognitive development was the Two Choice Reaction Time task (<3 minutes of duration, computer-based), which assesses the accuracy and speed of perceptual decision-making. Mental health, substance use, and educational outcomes were assessed by validated standardized methods. Key variables were measured at baseline and 3-year follow-up. The predictive utility was assessed using static (deviations from the age-expected performance at baseline) and dynamic (deviations from the age-expected change in performance over time) indicators.Results The reliability of the task parameter was high (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.8). Static indicators of cognitive development significantly predicted concurrent mental, intellectual and educational difficulties, as well as incident and persistent educational difficulties and substance use in the 3-year follow-up. Dynamic indicators predicted persistent mental health problems.Conclusion Primary-care and mental health professionals need a time-efficient tool for tracking deviations from age-expected cognitive development, which predicts multiple unwanted outcomes at the same time. If replicated, future results could support the generation of tools for tracking risk for mental health, substance use, and educational difficulties.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFinancial Disclosure: Prof Pan receives a post-doctoral scholarship from FAPESP. Prof Salum received research grants from national funding agencies: FAPERGS, CAPES, and CNPq. Prof Miguel and Bressan received research grants from national funding agencies: FAPESP, CAPES, CNPq. Prof Bressan also received research grants from Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Roche in the last 5 years. Prof Bressan has participated in speaker bureaus for Ache, Janssen, Lundbeck, and Novartis and has been a consultant for Janssen, Novartis, and Roche. Prof Rohde was on speakers' bureau and/or acted as a consultant for Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Medice, Novartis, receives authorship royalties from Oxford Press and ArtMed, and has received unrestricted educational and research support from Eli-Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Shire, and Novartis. Funding Information: This work is supported by the National Institute of Developmental Psychiatry, a science and technology institute funded by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq; National Council for Scientific and Technological Development; grant number 573974/2008-0 and 465550/2014-2) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP; Research Support Foundation of the State of São Paulo; grant number 2008/57896-8 and 2014/50917-0). The funders did not interfere in data collection, analysis, design, or interpretation of the study. Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available under request.2C-RTTwo Choice Reaction Time TaskAICAkaike Information CriterionCBCLChild Behavior ChecklistCCTConflict Control taskCFAConfirmatory Factor Analysis ModelGAMGeneralized Additive ModelICCIntra-class Correlation CoefficientSBCSchwartz Bayesian CriterionSDStandard DeviationPUprocessing efficiency unitsWHOWorld Health Organization