PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Sohrab Towfighi
AU  - Arnav Agarwal
AU  - Denise Y. F. Mak
AU  - Amol Verma
TI  - Labelling chest x-ray reports using an open-source NLP and ML tool for text data binary classification
AID  - 10.1101/19012518
DP  - 2019 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 19012518
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/22/19012518.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/22/19012518.full
AB  - The chest x-ray is a commonly requested diagnostic test on internal medicine wards which can diagnose many acute pathologies needing intervention. We developed a natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML) model to identify the presence of opacities or endotracheal intubation on chest x-rays using only the radiology report. This a preliminary report of our work and findings. Using the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) dataset, housing inpatient clinical and administrative data from 7 major hospitals, we retrieved 1000 plain film radiology reports which were classified according to 4 labels by an internal medicine resident. NLP/ML models were developed to identify the following on the radiograph reports: the report is that of a chest x-ray, there is definite absence of an opacity, there is definite presence of an opacity, the report is a follow-up report with minimal details in its text, and there is an endotracheal tube in place. Our NLP/ML model development methodology included a random search of either TF-IDF or bag-of-words for vectorization along with random search of various ML models. Our Python programming scripts were made publicly available on GitHub to allow other parties to train models using their own text data. 100 randomly generated ML pipelines were compared using 10-fold cross validation on 75% of the data, while 25% of the data was left out for generalizability testing. With respect to the question of whether a chest x-ray definitely lacks an opacity, the model’s performance metrics were accuracy of 0.84, precision of 0.94, recall of 0.81, and receiver operating characteristic area under curve of 0.86. Model performance was worse when trained against a highly imbalanced dataset despite the use of an advanced oversampling technique.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) was supported by grants from the Green Shield Canada Foundation and the University of Toronto, Division of General Internal Medicine.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is not publicly available.