TY - JOUR T1 - Physicians in the management and leadership of health care: A systematic review of the conditions conducive to organizational performance JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/19011379 SP - 19011379 AU - Mairi Savage AU - Carl Savage AU - Mats Brommels AU - Pamela Mazzocato Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/05/19011379.abstract N2 - Introduction The influx of management ideas into health care has triggered considerable debate about if and how managerial and medical logics can co-exist. Recent reviews suggest that clinician involvement in hospital leadership can lead to superior performance.Objective To systematically explore the conditions instrumental for medical leadership to have an impact on organizational performance.Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Psychinfo for peer-reviewed, empirical, English language articles and reviews published between January 1, 2006 and August 12, 2018. We performed a thematic synthesis through inductive line-by-line coding of the included studies.Results The search yielded 1447 publications, of which 62 were included. Three major themes were identified that described a movement 1. From medical protectionism to management through medicine, 2. From command and control to participatory leadership practices, and 3. Organizational practices to support incidental versus willing leaders. Based on these themes, the authors developed a model to depict conditions that facilitate or impede the influence of medical leadership through a virtuous cycle of management through medicine or a vicious cycle of medical protectionism.Conclusions This review helps individuals, organizations, educators, and trainers better understand how medical leadership can be both a boon and a barrier to the performance of health care organizations. In contrast to the conventional view of conflicting logics, medical leadership would benefit from a more integrative mental model of management and medicine. Nurturing medical engagement requires participatory leadership enabled through long-term investments at the individual, organizational, and system levels. These combined efforts will enable a shift to new leadership paradigms suitable to the complexity of health care, and establish conditions favorable for large-system transformation and health care reform.Strengths and limitations of this studyWhile previous literature reviews have established a correlation between physicians in leadership roles and organizational performance, this is to our knowledge the first review that seeks to explore what contributes to that link.The review expands on the typically quantitative focus of systematic reviews by providing a thematic synthesis of fifty-five empirical studies and seven literature reviews.A model is presented that depicts a virtuous cycle of management through medicine and a vicious cycle of medical protectionism.This review is limited by the quality and heterogeneity of the included studies.While plausible correlations between conditions and performance outcomes are explored, to establish causality requires study designs that can determine the strength of the relationships.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was commissioned by the Swedish Medical Association. Additional financial support for MS came from AFA Insurance (#150162). PM was funded by the Strategic Research Area Health Care Science, Karolinska Institute/UmeƄ University during the project period.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData for this study includes peer-reviewed empirical studies and literature reviews. The detailed overview of included studies is provided as supplementary information. Data extraction and analysis was performed in NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012. The NVivo file can be made available upon reasonable request. ER -