TY - JOUR T1 - Quaternary Prevention: Is this Concept Relevant to Public Health? A Bibliometric and Descriptive Content Analysis JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/19007526 SP - 19007526 AU - Miguel Andino Depallens AU - Jane Mary de Medeiros Guimarães AU - Naomar Almeida Filho Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/02/19007526.abstract N2 - Objective To measure and map research output on Quaternary Prevention (P4) and outline research trends; and to assess the papers content, mainly regarding methods and subjects approached. In this way, the authors hope to contribute to the improvement of global knowledge about P4 in order to evaluate the relevance of this concept for public health.Design Bibliometric and descriptive content analysis.Setting International, without any geographical restriction.Articles reviewed Scientific articles about P4 recorded in Pubmed, LILACS, Scielo or CINAHL published until August 2018, with correspondent full articles available in Portuguese, English, Spanish, German or French.Main outcome measures Year of publication, first authors’ name and nationality, journals’ name, country and ranking, publication language, used methods and main reported subjects.Results 65 articles were included, published in 33 journals of 16 countries between 2003 and 2018 with a peak of publications in 2015. The first authors came from 17 different countries, 23% of them were Brazilian and Uruguay was the leading nation according to the scientific production per capita. 40% of all the selected articles were in English, 32% in Portuguese, 26% in Spanish. 28% of the papers were published in Q1 or Q2 journals. The research outputs on P4 begun first in the South of Europe, went to South America and then expanded worldwide. 88% of the articles were bibliographic research and 38% of all focused on specific examples of medical overuse (including several screening tests).Conclusions Quaternary prevention represents an ethical and valid approach to prevent occurence of iatrogenic events and to achieve equal and fair access to health services. Conceptual, geographical and linguistic elements, as well as WONCA conferences and type of healthcare systems in the authors’ country were fundamental factors that affected research output. The quantity of available studies is still limited, therefore further investigations are recommended to assess the effective impact of P4 on public health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableNot applicable. ER -