TY - JOUR T1 - Quality of care at safety-net hospitals and the impact on pay-for-performance reimbursement JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/19010843 SP - 19010843 AU - Reith R. Sarkar AU - Patrick T. Courtney AU - Katie Bachand AU - Paige Sheridan AU - Paul Riviere AU - Zachary D. Guss AU - Christian R. Lopez AU - Michael G. Brandel AU - Matthew P. Banegas AU - James D. Murphy Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/11/02/19010843.abstract N2 - Background Pay-for-performance reimbursement ties hospital payments to standardized quality of care metrics. The impact of pay-for-performance reimbursement models on safety-net hospitals, which care primarily for uninsured or underinsured patients, remains poorly defined. This study evaluates how standardized quality of care metrics vary by a hospital’s safety-net status, and helps us better understand the potential impact that pay-for-performance reimbursement could have on funding of safety-net hospitals.Methods We identified 1,703,865 bladder, breast, cervix, colon, endometrium, gastric, lung, ovary, or rectum cancer patients treated at 1,344 hospitals diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Safety-net burden was defined for each hospital as the percentage of uninsured or Medicaid patients cared for by that hospital. Hospitals were grouped into low-, medium-, and high-burden hospitals. We evaluated the impact of safety-net burden on concordance with 20 standardized quality of care measures, adjusting for differences in patient age, gender, stage at diagnosis, and comorbidity.Results Patients seen at high-burden hospitals were more likely to be young, male, black, Hispanic, and to reside in a low-income and low-educated region. High-burden hospitals had lower adherence to 13 of 20 quality measures compared to low-burden hospitals (all p<0.05). Among the 350 high-burden hospitals, the quality measures were lowest for those caring for the highest fraction of uninsured or Medicaid patients, minority serving hospitals, and those caring for less educated patients (all p<0.001).Discussion Cancer care at safety-net hospitals was associated with lower concordance to standardized quality of care measures. Under a pay-for-performance reimbursement model these lower quality of care scores could decrease payments to safety-net hospitals, potentially increasing health disparities for at-risk cancer patients.Competing Interest StatementRRS and JDM receive compensation for consulting from Boston Consulting Group. PR receives compensation for consulting from Peptide Logic, LLC.Funding StatementNIH TL1 TR001443 (RRS, PTC, PR, MGB), NIH U54 CA132379 (JDM)Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript is publicly available through the National Cancer Database (NCDB). ER -