TY - JOUR T1 - Lower limb muscle activity underlying temporal gait asymmetry post-stroke JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/19010421 SP - 19010421 AU - Gabriela M. Rozanski AU - Andrew H. Huntley AU - Lucas D. Crosby AU - Alison Schinkel-Ivy AU - Avril Mansfield AU - Kara K. Patterson Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/29/19010421.abstract N2 - Objective Asymmetric walking after stroke is common, detrimental, and difficult to treat, but current knowledge of underlying physiological mechanisms is limited. This study investigated electromyographic (EMG) features of temporal gait asymmetry (TGA).Methods Participants post-stroke with or without TGA and control adults (n=27, 8, and 9, respectively) performed self-paced overground gait trials. EMG, force plate, and motion capture data were collected. Lower limb muscle activity was compared across groups and sides (more/less affected). Correlation between burst timing variables and asymmetry ratios was examined.Results Significant group by side interaction effects were found: fewer TGA group dorsiflexor bursts during swing (p=.0009), more affected plantarflexor stance activity ended early (p=.0006) and less affected dorsiflexor on/off time was delayed (p<.01) in persons with asymmetry compared to symmetric and normative controls. Less affected side EMG timing correlated most with swing time ratio (r=0.68-0.90, p<.001).Conclusions Temporal patterns of muscular activation, particularly about the ankle around the stance-to-swing transition period, are associated with TGA. The results may reflect specific impairments or compensations that affect locomotor coordination.Significance Neuromuscular underpinnings of spatiotemporal asymmetry have not been previously characterized. These novel findings may inform targeted therapeutic strategies to improve gait quality after stroke.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by a Collaborative Health Research Projects Grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the National Science Engineering Research Council the Heart and Stroke Foundation [#337523]; Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 133577]. The authors also acknowledge the support of the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; equipment and space have been funded with grants from the Canada Foundation for Innovation, Ontario Innovation Trust, and Ministry of Research and Innovation. AM holds a New Investigator Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MSH 141983) and KP holds a salary award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation. Sponsors were not involved in study design and execution or article preparation.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not available; participants did not provide consent for sharing data outside the institution. ER -