RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Clinical Laboratory Validation and Implementation of Quantitative, Real-Time PCR-based Monitoring of NPM1 Type A Mutation JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 19010124 DO 10.1101/19010124 A1 Joelle Racchumi A1 Wayne Tam A1 Michael J Kluk YR 2019 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/29/19010124.abstract AB NPM1 is frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and the mutations consist of a variety of small insertions; the most common NPM1 mutation (ie, Type A) accounts for approximately 80% of all NPM1 mutations. NPM1 mutations have been reported to have prognostic significance in AML and, more recently, monitoring mutant NPM1 levels during and after therapy has been described to predict relapse and survival. Despite the published relevance of this molecular biomarker, routine residual disease monitoring for mutant NPM1 levels has not been widely adopted in many academic clinical laboratories. In this manuscript, we present the validation and implementation of a quantitative, real-time PCR-based method for the monitoring of NPM1 Type A mutant transcripts, for use in routine practice in a clinical laboratory. We have found that this assay format is sensitive and reproducible. We describe the rigorous validation procedure and share observations that will help other clinical laboratories that may wish to implement this type of testing. We show comparison of the results from this assay to other assays and a representative case is provided which highlights the utility of the findings from this assay. Taken together, in the context of molecular testing for residual disease in AML, which is an area of practice that continues to expand, we have found that this method and protocol will serve as an appropriate option for monitoring NPM1 Type A mutation levels in clinical practice.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors, or their institutions, did not receive payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableN/A