RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Using Artificial Intelligence To Label Free-Text Operative And Ultrasound Reports For Grading Pediatric Appendicitis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.30.23294850
DO 10.1101/2023.08.30.23294850
A1 Abu-Ashour, Waseem
A1 Emil, Sherif
A1 Poenaru, Dan
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/09/01/2023.08.30.23294850.abstract
AB Purpose Data science approaches personalizing pediatric appendicitis management are hampered by small datasets and unstructured electronic medical records (EMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on large language models (LLMs) can structure free-text EMR data. Here we compare data extraction quality between ChatGPT-4 and human data collectors.Methods To train AI models to grade pediatric appendicitis preoperatively, several data collectors (medical students and research assistants) extracted detailed preoperative and operative data from 2100 children operated for acute appendicitis between 2014-2021. Collectors were trained and certified for the task based on satisfactory Kappa scores. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to structure free text from 103 random anonymized ultrasound and operative records in the dataset using the set variables and coding options, and to estimate the Pediatric Appendicitis Grade (PAG) from the operative report. A pediatric surgeon then adjudicated all data, identifying errors in each method.Results Within the 44 ultrasound (42.7%) and 32 operative reports (31.1%) discordant in at least one field, 98% of the errors were found in the manual data extraction. The PAG was erroneously assigned manually in 29 patients (28.2%), and by ChatGPT-4 in 3 (2.9%). Across datasets, the use of the AI chatbot was able to avoid misclassification in 59.2% of the records including both reports and extracted data approx. 100x faster than manually.Conclusion An AI chatbot significantly outperformed manual data extraction in accuracy for ultrasound and operative reports, and correctly assigned the PAG score. While wider validation is required and data safety concerns must be fully addressed, these novel AI tools show significant promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of research data collection.Highlights 1. What is known about this topic?AI chatbots have several benefits and implications including healthcare uses.2. What new information is contained in this article?AI chatbot was proven to be more accurate when compared to human data extraction.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis publication is based on data from a larger ongoing project (Augmented Intelligence to Support Shared Decision-Making in the Care of Children with Appendicitis), which is supported through a project grant of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Review Ethics Board (REB) of McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) gave ethical approval for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors