PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Linda Wang AU - Neeraj Javadekar AU - Ananya Rajagopalan AU - Nichole M. Rogovoy AU - Kazi T. Haq AU - Craig S. Broberg AU - Larisa G. Tereshchenko TI - Eligibility for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator in Congenital Heart Disease AID - 10.1101/19009175 DP - 2019 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 19009175 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/18/19009175.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/18/19009175.full AB - Background The goals of this study were: assess left-and right-sided subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) eligibility in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients, use machine learning to predict S-ICD eligibility in ACHD patients, and transform 12-lead ECG to S-ICD 3-lead ECG, and vice versa.Methods ACHD outpatients (n=101; age 42±14 y; 52% female; 85% white; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 56±9%) were enrolled in a prospective study. Supine and standing 12-lead ECG was recorded simultaneously with a right- and left-sided S-ICD 3-lead ECG. Peak-to-peak QRS and T amplitudes, RR, PR, QT, QTc, QRS intervals, Tmax, and R/Tmax (31 predictor variables) were tested. Model selection, training, and testing were performed using supine ECG datasets. Validation was performed using standing ECG datasets and out-of-sample non-ACHD population (n=68; age 54±16 y; 54% female; 94% white; LVEF 61±8%).Results A 40% of participants were ineligible for S-ICD. Tetralogy of Fallot patients passed right-sided screening (57%) more often than left-sided (21%; McNemar’s χ2 P=0.025). The ridge model demonstrated the best cross-validation function. Validation of the ridge models was satisfactory for standing left-sided [ROC AUC 0.687 (95%CI 0.582-0.791)] and right-sided [ROC AUC 0.655(95%CI 0.549-0.762)] S-ICD eligibility prediction. Out-of-sample validation in the non-ACHD population yielded a 100% sensitivity of the pre-selected threshold for the elastic net model. Validation of the transformation matrices showed satisfactory agreement (<0.1 mV difference).Conclusion Nearly half of the contemporary ACHD population is ineligible for S-ICD. Machine-learning prediction of S-ICD eligibility can be used for screening of S-ICD candidates.Competing Interest StatementThis physician-initiated study was partially supported by the Boston-Scientific Center for the Advancement of Research. The Boston Scientific company had no role in the design, execution, analyses, and interpretation of the data and results of this study.Clinical TrialNCT03209726Funding StatementThis physician-initiated study was partially supported by the Boston-Scientific Center for the Advancement of Research. This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health HL118277 (LGT).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableA MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc, Natick, MA) open-source code for ECG analyses and a user manual is provided at https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab/S-ICD_eligibility. Fully de-identified raw digital ECG signal data generated for this study are available at https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab/S-ICD_eligibility. All calculators are freely available at www.ecgpredictscd.org. https://github.com/Tereshchenkolab/S-ICD_eligibility http://www.ecgpredictscd.org/sicd-eligibility