RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Systematic review and network meta-analysis with individual participant data on Cord Management at Preterm Birth (iCOMP): study protocol
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19007708
DO 10.1101/19007708
A1 Anna Lene Seidler
A1 Lelia Duley
A1 Anup Katheria
A1 Catalina De Paco Matallana
A1 Eugene Dempsey
A1 Heike Rabe
A1 John Kattwinkel
A1 Judith Mercer
A1 Justin Josephsen
A1 Karen Fairchild
A1 Ola Andersson
A1 Shigeharu Hosono
A1 Venkataseshan Sundaram
A1 Vikram Datta
A1 Walid El-Naggar
A1 William Tarnow-Mordi
A1 Thomas P.A. Debray
A1 Stuart Hooper
A1 Martin Kluckow
A1 Graeme Polglase
A1 Peter Davis
A1 Alan Montgomery
A1 Kylie E Hunter
A1 Angie Barba
A1 John Simes
A1 Lisa Askie
A1 on behalf of the iCOMP collaboration
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/10/05/19007708.abstract
AB Introduction Timing of cord clamping and other cord management strategies may improve outcomes at preterm birth. However, it is unclear whether benefits apply to all preterm subgroups such as those who usually receive immediate neonatal care. Previous and current trials compare various policies, including immediate cord clamping, time- or physiology-based deferred cord clamping, and cord milking. Individual participant data (IPD) enables exploration of different strategies within subgroups. Network meta-analysis (NMA) enables comparison and ranking of all available interventions using a combination of direct and indirect comparisons.Objectives 1) To evaluate the effectiveness of cord management strategies for preterm infants on neonatal mortality and morbidity overall and for different participant characteristics using IPD meta-analysis; and 2) to evaluate and rank the effect of different cord management strategies for preterm births on mortality and other key outcomes using NMA.Methods and analysis We will conduct a systematic search of Medline, Embase, clinical trial registries, and other sources for all planned, ongoing and completed randomised controlled trials comparing alternative cord management strategies at preterm birth (before 37 weeks’ gestation). IPD will be sought for all trials. First, deferred clamping and cord milking will be compared with immediate clamping in pairwise IPD meta-analyses. The primary outcome will be death prior to hospital discharge. Effect differences will be explored for pre-specified subgroups of participants. Second, all identified cord management strategies will be compared and ranked in an IPD NMA for the primary outcome and the key secondary outcomes intraventricular haemorrhage (any grade) and infant blood transfusions (any). Treatment effect differences by participant characteristics will be identified. Inconsistency and heterogeneity will be explored.Ethics and dissemination Approved by University of Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (2018/886). Results will be relevant to clinicians, guideline-developers and policy-makers, and will be disseminated via publications, presentations, and media releases.Registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12619001305112.STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYThis will be the most comprehensive review to date of interventions for umbilical cord management in preterm infants and the findings will be highly relevant to clinicians and guideline developersThe use of individual participant data will allow assessment of the best treatment option for key subgroups of participantsNetwork meta-analysis will enable the comparison and ranking of all available treatment options using direct and indirect evidenceFor some of the trials it will not be possible to obtain individual participant data, so published aggregate results will be used insteadRisk of bias in the primary trials will be assessed using Cochrane criteria, and certainty of evidence for the meta-analyses will be appraised using the GRADE approach for the pairwise comparisons, and the CINeMA approach for the network meta-analysisCompeting Interest StatementLelia Duley, Anup Katheria, Catalina De Paco Matallana, Eugene Dempsey, Heike Rabe, John Kattwinkel, Judith Mercer, Justin Josephsen, Karen Fairchild, Ola Andersson, Shigeharu Hosono, Venkataseshan Sundaram, Vikram Datta, Walid El-Naggar, and William Tarnow-Mordi are Chief Investigators for eligible trialsClinical TrialACTRN12619001305112Funding StatementDeveloping the protocol and establishing the collaborative group was supported by the UK National Institute of Health Research with a grant entitled “The Preterm Birth Programme” (number RPPG060910107). This grant presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme (RP-PG- 0609-10107). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. Funding for individual trials remains the responsibility of the trialists themselves. Funding to undertake data collection and data analysis for the iCOMP Collaboration has been provided by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council via a Project Grant (APP1163585).Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis is a protocol and therefore no data are currently available.iCOMPindividual participant data on Cord Management at Preterm birthCENTRALCochrane Central Register of Controlled TrialsCINeMAConfidence in Network meta-analysisCPAPcontinuous positive airway pressureIPDindividual participant dataNICENational Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceNICUneonatal intensive care unitNIHRNational Institute for Health ResearchNMAnetwork meta-analysisPRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisUKUnited KingdomWHOWorld Health OrganizationILCORInternational Liaison Committee on ResuscitationPROSPEROInternational prospective register of systematic reviews