PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Liu, Jenny J.W. AU - Ein, Natalie AU - Gervasio, Julia AU - Easterbrook, Bethany AU - Nouri, Maede S. AU - Nazarov, Anthony AU - Richardson, J. Don TI - Usability and Accuracy of the SWIFT-ActiveScreener: Preliminary evaluation for use in clinical research AID - 10.1101/2023.08.24.23294573 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.08.24.23294573 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/25/2023.08.24.23294573.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/25/2023.08.24.23294573.full AB - Systematic reviews (SRs) employ standardized methodological processes for synthesizing empirical evidence to answer specific research questions. These processes include rigorous screening phases to determine eligibility of articles against strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Despite these processes, SRs are a significant undertaking, and this type of research often necessitates extensive human resource requirements, especially when the scope of the review is large. Given the substantial resources and time commitment required, we investigated a way in which the screening process might be accelerated while maintaining high fidelity and adherence to SR processes. More recently, researchers have increasingly turned to artificial intelligence-based (AI) software to expedite the screening process. This paper evaluated the accuracy and usabiity of a novel, machine learning program, Sciome SWIFT-ActiveScreener (ActiveScreener) in a large SR of mental health outcomes following treatment for PTSD. ActiveScreener exceeded the expected 95% accuracy of the program to predict inclusion or exclusion of relevant articles, and was reported to be user friendly by both novice and seasoned screeners. Our results showed that ActiveScreener, when used appropriately, may save considerable time and human resources when performing SR.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021245754 Funding StatementThis work is supported in part by the Atlas Institute for Veterans and FamiliesAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This work is part of meta-analysis which is exempt from research ethics.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe data underlying the results presented in the study are available by request.