TY - JOUR T1 - The Mezurio smartphone application: Evaluating the feasibility of frequent digital cognitive assessment in the PREVENT dementia study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/19005124 SP - 19005124 AU - Claire Lancaster AU - Jasmine Blane AU - Amy Chinner AU - Leona Wolters AU - Ivan Koychev AU - Chris Hinds Y1 - 2019/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/09/14/19005124.abstract N2 - Background Smartphones may significantly contribute to the detection of early cognitive decline at scale by enabling remote, frequent, sensitive, economic assessment. Several prior studies have sustained engagement with participants remotely over a period of a week; extending this to a period of a month would clearly give greater opportunity for measurement. However, as such study durations are increased, so too is the need to understand how participant burden and scientific value might be optimally balanced.Objectives We explore the ‘little but often’ approach to assessment employed by the Mezurio app, interacting with participants every day for over a month. We aim to understand whether this extended remote study duration is feasible, and which factors might promote sustained participant engagement over such study durations.Methods Thirty-five adults (aged 40-59 years) with no diagnosis of cognitive impairment were prompted to interact with the Mezurio smartphone app platform for up to 36 days, completing short, daily episodic memory tasks in addition to optional executive function and language tests. A subset (n=20) completed semi-structured interviews focused on their experience using the app.Results Average compliance with the schedule of learning for subsequent memory test was 80%, with 88% of participants still actively engaged by the final task. Thematic analysis of participants’ experiences highlighted schedule flexibility, a clear user-interface, and performance feedback as important considerations for engagement with remote digital assessment.Conclusions Despite the extended study duration, participants demonstrated high compliance with the tasks scheduled and were extremely positive about their experiences. Long durations of remote digital interaction are therefore definitely feasible, but only when careful attention is paid to the design of the users’ experience.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementChris Hinds is funded by the Robertson Foundation and Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre. Claire Lancaster is funded by Eli-Lilly and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Ivan Koychev is funded through the National Institute of Health Research Integrated Academic Training scheme and declares support for this study through Oxford Clinical Academic Graduate School Clinical Lecturer Support Scheme, the Academy of Medical Sciences Clinical Lecturer Starter Grant and the Medical Research Council Deep and Frequent Phenotyping study grant. Amy Chinner, Jasmine Blane and Leona Wolters are funded in part through the Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data contained within this article is not publicly available. ER -