RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Where should new parkrun events be located? Modelling the potential impact of 200 new events on geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in access and participation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 19004143
DO 10.1101/19004143
A1 Schneider, PP
A1 Smith, RA
A1 Bullas, AM
A1 Bayley, T
A1 Haake, SSJ
A1 Brennan, A
A1 Goyder, E
YR 2019
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2019/08/29/19004143.abstract
AB Background parkrun, an international movement which organises free weekly 5km running events, has been widely praised for encouraging inactive individuals to participate in physical activity. Recently, parkrun received funding to establish 200 new events across England, specifically targeted at deprived communities. This study aims to investigate the relationships between geographic access, deprivation, and participation in parkrun, and to inform the planned expansion by proposing future event locations.Methods We conducted an ecological spatial analysis, using data on 455 parkrun events, 2,842 public green spaces, and 32,844 English census areas. Poisson regression was applied to investigate the relationships between the distances to events, deprivation, and parkrun participation rates. Model estimates were incorporated into a location-allocation analysis, to identify locations for future events that maximise deprivation-weighted parkrun participation.Results The distance to the nearest event (in km) and the Index of Multiple Deprivation (score) were both independently negatively associated with local parkrun participation rates. Rate ratios were 0.921 (95%CI = 0.921-0.922) and 0.959 (0.959-0.959), respectively. The recommended 200 new event locations were estimated to increase weekly runs by 6.9% (from 82,824 to 88,506). Of the additional runs, 4.1% (n=231) were expected to come from the 10% most deprived communities.Conclusion Participation in parkrun is wide spread across England. We provide recommendations for new parkrun event location, in order to increase participation from deprived communities. However, the creation of new events alone is unlikely to be an effective strategy. Further research is needed to study how barriers to participation can be reduced.Online Map, data, and source code An interactive online map is available here, and the annotated R source code and all data that were used to generate the results of this study are provided on a repository.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a PhD studentship.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.Not ApplicableAny clinical trials involved have been registered with an ICMJE-approved registry such as ClinicalTrials.gov and the trial ID is included in the manuscript.Not ApplicableI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant Equator, ICMJE or other checklist(s) as supplementary files, if applicable.Not ApplicableAll data and the R source code that were used to generate the reported results are openly provided on a github repository under a CC BY license. https://github.com/bitowaqr/iolmap_analysis https://github.com/bitowaqr/iol_map http://iol-map.shef.ac.uk/