RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Radiologically Visible Intraspinal Air Was Very Common After Epidural Access Attempts Among Our Peripartum Patients Who Had Undergone Radiological Examinations
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.08.15.23294123
DO 10.1101/2023.08.15.23294123
A1 Gupta, Deepak
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/08/16/2023.08.15.23294123.abstract
AB Background The incidence of intracranial air after neuraxial access attempts was recently quantified. Therefore, the incidence of intraspinal air after neuraxial access attempts needs to be quantified.Objective To ascertain how common was radiologically visible intraspinal air per computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MR) of spine among our peripartum patients.Methods For a seven-year period (July 1, 2015-June 30, 2022), medical records of our peripartum patients who had undergone CT/MR of spine were retrospectively reviewed to rule out the presence of recent neuraxial access attempts before their radiological examinations of spine. Concurrently, those radiological examinations of spine were reviewed to rule out the presence of radiologically visible intraspinal air.Results Among 27 peripartum patients who had undergone CT/MR of spine during the seven-year period, 24 peripartum patients had received recent neuraxial access attempts prior to their radiological examinations wherein 25% had radiologically visible intraspinal air. However, as none of the spinal-only access patients had radiologically visible intraspinal air, intraspinal air was radiologically visible among 32% patients who had recent epidural access attempts.Conclusion Radiologically visible intraspinal air was very common after epidural access attempts among our peripartum patients who had undergone radiological examinations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Wayne State University: IRB Administration Office gave ethical approval as concurrence of exemption for this work.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript