RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Do polygenic indices capture “direct” effects on child externalizing behavior? Within-family analyses in two longitudinal birth cohorts
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.31.23290802
DO 10.1101/2023.05.31.23290802
A1 Tanksley, Peter T.
A1 Brislin, Sarah J.
A1 Wertz, Jasmin
A1 de Vlaming, Ronald
A1 Courchesne-Krak, Natasia S.
A1 Mallard, Travis T.
A1 Raffington, Laurel L.
A1 Linnér, Richard Karlsson
A1 Koellinger, Philipp
A1 Palmer, Abraham
A1 Sanchez-Roige, Alexandra
A1 Waldman, Irwin
A1 Dick, Danielle
A1 Moffitt, Terrie E.
A1 Caspi, Avshalom
A1 Harden, K. Paige
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/04/2023.05.31.23290802.abstract
AB Behaviors and disorders characterized by difficulties with self-regulation, such as problematic substance use, antisocial behavior, and symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), incur high costs for individuals, families, and communities. These externalizing behaviors often appear early in the life course and can have far-reaching consequences. Researchers have long been interested in direct measurements of genetic risk for externalizing behaviors, which can be incorporated alongside other known risk factors to improve efforts at early identification and intervention. In a preregistered analysis drawing on data from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study (N=862 twins) and the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS; N=2,824 parent-child trios), two longitudinal cohorts from the UK, we leveraged molecular genetic data and within-family designs to test for genetic effects on externalizing behavior that are unbiased by the common sources of environmental confounding. Results are consistent with the conclusion that an externalizing polygenic index (PGI) captures causal effects of genetic variants on externalizing problems in children and adolescents, with an effect size that is comparable to those observed for other established risk factors in the research literature on externalizing behavior. Additionally, we find that polygenic associations vary across development (peaking from age 5-10 years), that parental genetics (assortment and parent-specific effects) and family-level covariates affect prediction little, and that sex differences in polygenic prediction are present but only detectable using within-family comparisons. Based on these findings, we believe that the PGI for externalizing behavior is a promising means for studying the development of disruptive behaviors across child development.Significance Statement Externalizing behaviors/disorders are important but difficult to predict and address. Twin models have suggested that externalizing behaviors are heritable (∼80%), but it has been difficult to measure genetic risk factors directly. Here, we go beyond heritability studies by quantifying genetic liability for externalizing behaviors using a polygenic index (PGI) and employing within-family comparisons to remove sources of environmental confounding typical of such polygenic predictors. In two longitudinal cohorts, we find that the PGI is associated with variation in externalizing behaviors within families, and the effect size is comparable to established risk factors for externalizing behaviors. Our results suggest that genetic variants associated with externalizing behaviors, unlike many other social-science phenotypes, primarily operate through direct genetic pathways.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementGrant support: This study was supported by NIH grants 5R01DA050721 (DD) and 5R01HD092548 (KPH), P50DA037844 (AAP), as well as T29KT0526 and T32IR5226 (NIH/NIDA DP1DA054394; ASR).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Texas at Austin Institutional Review board granted ethical approval.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData access is restricted and requires an application to the data owners. https://cls.ucl.ac.uk/cls-studies/millennium-cohort-study/ https://eriskstudy.com/