PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Sarah R Haile AU - Samuel Gunz AU - Gabriela P Peralta AU - Agnė Ulytė AU - Alessia Raineri AU - Sonja Rueegg AU - Viktoriia Yasenok AU - Thomas Radtke AU - Milo A Puhan AU - Susi Kriemler TI - Health-related quality of life and adherence to physical activity and screen time recommendations in schoolchildren: longitudinal cohort Ciao Corona AID - 10.1101/2023.03.27.23287611 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.03.27.23287611 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2023.03.27.23287611.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/06/01/2023.03.27.23287611.full AB - Objectives We investigated changes in adherence to physical activity (PA) and screen time (ST) recommendations of children and adolescents throughout the pandemic, and their association with health-related quality of life (HRQOL).Methods 1769 primary (PS, grades 1-6) and secondary (SS, 7-9) school children from Ciao Corona, a school-based cohort study in Zurich, Switzerland, with 5 questionnaires 2020-2022. HRQOL was assessed using the KINDL questionnaire. PA (≥ 60 min/day moderate-to-vigorous PA) and ST (≤ 2 hours/day ST) recommendations followed WHO guidelines.Results Adherence to PA recommendations dropped in 2020 (83% to 59% PS, 77% to 52% SS), but returned to pre-pandemic levels by 2022 (79%, 66%). Fewer children met ST recommendations in 2020 (74% PS, 29% SS) and 2021 (82%, 37%) than pre-pandemic (95%, 68%). HRQOL decreased 3 points between 2020 and 2022, and was 9.7 points higher (95% CI 3.0-16.3) in March 2021 in children who met both versus no recommendations.Conclusions Adherence to WHO guidelines on PA and ST during the pandemic had a consistent association with HRQOL despite longitudinal changes in behavior.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study is part of Corona Immunitas research network, coordinated by the Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), and funded by fundraising of SSPH+ that includes funds of the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and private funders (ethical guidelines for funding stated by SSPH+ will be respected), by funds of the Cantons of Switzerland (Vaud, Zurich, and Basel) and by institutional funds of the Universities. Additional funding, specific to this study, was available from the University of Zurich Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ciao Corona was approved by the ethical committee of the canton of Zurich (2020-01336) (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04448717). All participants provided written informed consent before being enrolled in the study.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesUpon study completion in 2023, de-identified and potentially aggregated participant data, together with required data dictionaries, will be available on reasonable request by email to the corresponding author. The purpose and methods of data analysis will be evaluated by the study team first to ensure that it complies with the ethics approval.