PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Samuele Ceruti
AU  - Andrea Glotta
AU  - Mathieu Favre
AU  - Edoardo Tasciotti
AU  - Giovanni Bona
AU  - Antonietta Petrusic
AU  - Alain Borgeat
AU  - José Aguirre
AU  - Andrea Saporito
TI  - Inferior vena cava ultrasound <em>versus</em> passive leg raising test in guiding fluid administration in surgical patients prior to spinal anaesthesia: a post-hoc analysis of the ProCRHYSA randomized trial
AID  - 10.1101/2023.05.22.23290367
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.05.22.23290367
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/25/2023.05.22.23290367.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/25/2023.05.22.23290367.full
AB  - Background Spinal anaesthesia is commonly used for many surgical procedures. One of its potential complications is arterial hypotension, which is nowadays prevented by an empirical fluid administration without any hemodynamic status assessment. However, this practice could increase the risk of volume overload in cardiovascular high-risk patients. Two non-invasive tests are performed to identify fluid-responsiveness: the Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasound (IVCUS) and the Passive Leg Raising Test (PLRT). Aim of this post-hoc analysis was to compare these two methods in spontaneous-breathing patients to assess fluid responsiveness before spinal anaesthesia. Primary outcome was to analyze the incidence of arterial hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in elective surgery patients. Secondary endpoints compared the total fluids amount, the vasoactive drugs administered and the time needed to accomplish the whole procedure in both groups.Results The patients analyzed were 132 in the IVCUS group and 148 in the PLRT group; 39.6% of all patients developed arterial hypotension after spinal anaesthesia, 34.8% in the IVCUS group and 43.9% in the PLRT group (Chi-square 2.39, df = 1, p = 0.77). The mean total fluids amount was 794 ± 592 ml; 925 ± 631 ml for IVCUS group and 678 ± 529 ml for PLRT group (p < 0.001). Patients needed vasoactive drugs to restore normal arterial pressure were 18.2% of total, 15% in the IVCUS group and 20% in the PLRT group (p = 0.136). The mean time required to complete the entire procedure was 52 ± 18 min, 48 ± 10 min in the IVCUS group and 56 ± 13 min in the PLRT group (p < 0.001). Complications or out of protocol treatment were registered in 4.6% patients.Conclusions Fluid responsiveness assessment in spontaneous breathing patients before spinal anaesthesia could potentially prevent the risk of post-spinal hypotension. In elective surgery, IVCUS could be an accurate method to guide fluid administration in patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia, reducing the incidence of post-spinal hypotension when compared to PLRT.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT02070276Funding StatementNo funding was obtained for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study has been approved by the Ethics Committees (Ref. Cantonal Ethics Committee n. CE2796, international registration number NCT02070276); written informed consent was obtained from patients prior to randomization.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.ACE-InhibitorsAngiotensin-converting enzymeASAAmerican Society of AnesthesiologistsCIConfidence IntervalESICMEuropean Society Intensive Care MedicineetCO2End-tidal carbon dioxideIMAOMonoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)IQRInterquartile RangeIVCInferior Vena CavaIVC-CIIVC Collapsability IndexIVCUSInferior Vena Cava UltrasoundMAPMean Arterial PressurePLRTPassive Leg Raise TestPOCUSpoint-of-care ultrasoundProCRHYSAPROtocolized Care to Reduce HYpotension after Spinal AnaesthesiaSASpinal AnestesiaSSRISelective serotonin reuptake inhibitorsSVRsystemic vascular resistance