PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Tiu, Andrew AU - Bansal, Shweta TI - Estimating county-level flu vaccination in the United States AID - 10.1101/2023.05.10.23289756 DP - 2023 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2023.05.10.23289756 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/11/2023.05.10.23289756.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/11/2023.05.10.23289756.full AB - In the United States, influenza vaccines are an important part of public health efforts to blunt the effects of seasonal influenza epidemics. This in turn emphasizes the importance of understanding the spatial distribution of influenza vaccination coverage. Despite this, high quality data at a fine spatial scale and spanning a multitude of recent flu seasons are not readily available. To address this gap, we develop county-level counts of vaccination across five recent, consecutive flu seasons and fit a series of regression models to these data that account for bias. We find that the spatial distribution of our bias-corrected vaccination coverage estimates is generally consistent from season to season, with the highest coverage in the Northeast and Midwest but is spatially heterogeneous within states. We also observe a negative relationship between a county’s vaccination coverage and social vulnerability. Our findings stress the importance of quantifying flu vaccination coverage at a fine spatial scale, as relying on state or region-level estimates misses key heterogeneities.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01GM123007.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Patient records and information in the medical claims dataset were anonymized, deidentified, and aggregated. All analyses were performed with aggregated, seasonal data for flu vaccination instead of patient-level information. Ethical review was sought from the Institutional Review Board at Georgetown University and was deemed exempt.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.