RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Identifying core MRI sequences for reliable automatic brain metastasis segmentation
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.05.02.23289342
DO 10.1101/2023.05.02.23289342
A1 Josef A Buchner
A1 Jan C Peeken
A1 Lucas Etzel
A1 Ivan Ezhov
A1 Michael Mayinger
A1 Sebastian M Christ
A1 Thomas B Brunner
A1 Andrea Wittig
A1 Björn Menze
A1 Claus Zimmer
A1 Bernhard Meyer
A1 Matthias Guckenberger
A1 Nicolaus Andratschke
A1 Rami A El Shafie
A1 Jürgen Debus
A1 Susanne Rogers
A1 Oliver Riesterer
A1 Katrin Schulze
A1 Horst J Feldmann
A1 Oliver Blanck
A1 Constantinos Zamboglou
A1 Konstantinos Ferentinos
A1 Angelika Bilger
A1 Anca L Grosu
A1 Robert Wolff
A1 Jan S Kirschke
A1 Kerstin A Eitz
A1 Stephanie E Combs
A1 Denise Bernhardt
A1 Daniel Rückert
A1 Marie Piraud
A1 Benedikt Wiestler
A1 Florian Kofler
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/05/02/2023.05.02.23289342.abstract
AB Background Many automatic approaches to brain tumor segmentation employ multiple magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences. The goal of this project was to compare different combinations of input sequences to determine which MRI sequences are needed for effective automated brain metastasis (BM) segmentation.Methods We analyzed preoperative imaging (T1-weighted sequence ± contrast-enhancement (T1/T1-CE), T2-weighted sequence (T2), and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) sequence) from 333 patients with BMs from six centers. A baseline 3D U-Net with all four sequences and six U-Nets with plausible sequence combinations (T1-CE, T1, T2-FLAIR, T1-CE+T2-FLAIR, T1-CE+T1+T2-FLAIR, T1-CE+T1) were trained on 239 patients from two centers and subsequently tested on an external cohort of 94 patients from four centers.Results The model based on T1-CE alone achieved the best segmentation performance for BM segmentation with a median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.96. Models trained without T1-CE performed worse (T1-only: DSC = 0.70 and T2-FLAIR-only: DSC = 0.72). For edema segmentation, models that included both T1-CE and T2-FLAIR performed best (DSC = 0.93), while the remaining four models without simultaneous inclusion of these both sequences reached a median DSC of 0.81-0.89.Conclusions A T1-CE-only protocol suffices for the segmentation of BMs. The combination of T1-CE and T2-FLAIR is important for edema segmentation. Missing either T1-CE or T2-FLAIR decreases performance. These findings may improve imaging routines by omitting unnecessary sequences, thus allowing for faster procedures in daily clinical practice while enabling optimal neural network-based target definitions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation - PE 3303/1-1 (JCP), WI 4936/4-1 (BW)).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethics committee of Technical University of Munich gave ethical approval for this work (119/19 S-SR; 466/16 S)I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not available.