RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Reproducibility of 3D MRSI for imaging human brain glucose metabolism using direct (2H) and indirect (1H) detection of deuterium labeled compounds at 7T and clinical 3T
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2023.04.17.23288672
DO 10.1101/2023.04.17.23288672
A1 Fabian Niess
A1 Bernhard Strasser
A1 Lukas Hingerl
A1 Eva Niess
A1 Stanislav Motyka
A1 Gilbert Hangel
A1 Martin Krššák
A1 Stephan Gruber
A1 Benjamin Spurny-Dworak
A1 Siegfried Trattnig
A1 Thomas Scherer
A1 Rupert Lanzenberger
A1 Wolfgang Bogner
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/04/17/2023.04.17.23288672.abstract
AB Introduction Deuterium metabolic imaging (DMI) and quantitative exchange label turnover (QELT) are novel MR spectroscopy techniques for non-invasive imaging of human brain glucose and neurotransmitter metabolism with high clinical potential. Following oral or intravenous administration of non-ionizing [6,6’-2H2]-glucose, its uptake and synthesis of downstream metabolites can be mapped via direct or indirect detection of deuterium resonances using 2H MRSI (DMI) and 1H MRSI (QELT), respectively.The purpose of this study was to compare the dynamics of spatially resolved brain glucose metabolism, i.e., estimated concentration enrichment of deuterium labeled Glx (glutamate+glutamine) and Glc (glucose) acquired repeatedly in the same cohort of subjects using DMI at 7T and QELT at clinical 3T.Methods Five volunteers (4m/1f) were scanned in repeated sessions for 60 min after overnight fasting and 0.8g/kg oral [6,6’-2H2]-glucose administration using time-resolved 3D 2H FID-MRSI with elliptical phase encoding at 7T and 3D 1H FID-MRSI with a non-Cartesian concentric ring trajectory readout at clinical 3T.Results One hour after oral tracer administration regionally averaged deuterium labeled Glx4 concentrations and the dynamics were not significantly different over all participants between 7T 2H DMI and 3T 1H QELT data for GM (1.29±0.15 vs. 1.38±0.26 mM, p=0.65 & 21±3 vs. 26±3 µM/min, p=0.22) and WM (1.10±0.13 vs. 0.91±0.24 mM, p=0.34 & 19±2 vs. 17±3 µM/min, p=0.48). Also, the observed time constants of dynamic Glc6 data in GM (24±14 vs. 19±7 min, p=0.65) and WM (28±19 vs. 18±9 min, p=0.43) dominated regions showed no significant differences.Between individual 2H and 1H data points a weak to moderate negative correlation was observed for Glx4 concentrations in GM (r=-0.52, p<0.001), and WM (r=-0.3, p<0.001) dominated regions, while a strong negative correlation was observed for Glc6 data GM (r=- 0.61, p<0.001) and WM (r=-0.70, p<0.001).Conclusion This study demonstrates that indirect detection of deuterium labeled compounds using 1H QELT MRSI at widely available clinical 3T without additional hardware is able to reproduce absolute concentration estimates of downstream glucose metabolites and the dynamics of glucose uptake compared to 2H DMI data acquired at 7T. This suggests significant potential for widespread application in clinical settings especially in environments with limited access to ultra-high field scanners and dedicated RF hardware.Competing Interest StatementR. Lanzenberger received investigator-initiated research funding from Siemens Healthcare regarding clinical research using PET/MR. He is a shareholder of the start-up company BM Health GmbH since 2019.Clinical TrialDRKS00013218Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Institute of Health NIH R01EB031787 and the Austrian Science Fund: WEAVE I 6037 & KLI 1106 and Christian Doppler Laboratory for MR Imaging Biomarkers (BIOMAK)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:I confirm that the current study was approved by the ethic commission of the Medical University of Vienna and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesData generated by postprocessing methods (i.e., metabolic maps, LCModel basis sets, script files for data handling) are available online at: (https://github.com/MRSI-HFMR-Group-Vienna/DMIvsQELT.git). Raw data files are too large to be shared publicly and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request for research purposes only. Due to data protection policy 3D high resolution images are only available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author if approved by the requesting researchers local ethics committee. Link: https://github.com/MRSI-HFMR-Group-Vienna/DMIvsQELT.git). https://github.com/MRSI-HFMR-Group-Vienna/DMIvsQELT.git