RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The Interaction Effects of Age, APOE and Common Environmental Risk Factors on Human brain Structure
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2022.10.30.22281690
DO 10.1101/2022.10.30.22281690
A1 Chen, Jie
A1 Li, Tengfei
A1 Zhao, Bingxin
A1 Chen, Hui
A1 Yuan, Changzheng
A1 Gardern, Gwenn A.
A1 Wu, Guorong
A1 Zhu, Hongtu
YR 2023
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/22/2022.10.30.22281690.abstract
AB Mounting evidence suggests considerable diversity in brain aging trajectories, primarily arising from the complex interplay between age, genetic and environmental risk factors, leading to distinct patterns of micro- and macro-cerebral aging. The underlying mechanisms of such effects still remain unclear. We conducted a comprehensive association analysis between cerebral structural measures and prevalent risk factors, using data from 35,035 UK Biobank subjects aged 44-82. Participants were assessed for brain volume, white matter diffusivity, Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotypes, polygenic risk scores, lifestyles and socioeconomic status. We examined genetic and environmental effects and their interactions with age and sex, and identified 726 signals, with education, alcohol, and smoking affecting most brain regions. Our analysis revealed negative age-APOE-ε4 and positive age-APOE-ε2 interaction effects, respectively, especially in females on the volume of amygdala, positive age-sex-APOE-ε4 interaction on the cerebellar volume, positive age-excessive-alcohol interaction effect on the mean diffusivity of the splenium of the corpus callosum, positive age-healthy-diet interaction effect on the paracentral volume, and negative APOE-ε4-moderate-alcohol interaction effects on the axial diffusivity of the superior fronto-occipital fasciculus. These findings highlight the need of considering age, sex, genetic and environmental joint effects in elucidating normal or abnormal brain aging.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported in part by U.S. NIH grants NS110791 (J.C. and G.W.) and MH116527 (H.Z. and T.L.). We thank the individuals represented in the UK Biobank, studies for their participation and the research teams for their work in collecting, processing and disseminating these datasets for analysis. We gratefully acknowledge all the studies and databases that made GWAS summary data available. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank resource (application number 22783), subject to a data transfer agreement.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript All data produced are available online at https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/