TY - JOUR T1 - Utility of surveillance data for planning for dengue elimination in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a scenario tree modelling approach JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2023.03.14.23287232 SP - 2023.03.14.23287232 AU - Melanie Bannister-Tyrrell AU - Alison Hillman AU - Citra Indriani AU - Riris Andono Ahmad AU - Adi Utarini AU - Cameron P. Simmons AU - Katherine L. Anders AU - Evan Sargeant Y1 - 2023/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/18/2023.03.14.23287232.abstract N2 - Introduction Field trials and mathematical modelling studies suggest that elimination of dengue transmission may be possible through widespread release of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with the insect bacterium Wolbachia pipientis (wMel strain), in conjunction with routine dengue control activities. This study aimed to develop a modelling framework to guide planning for the potential elimination of locally-acquired dengue in Yogyakarta, a city of almost 400,000 people in Java, Indonesia.Methods A scenario tree modelling approach was used to estimate the sensitivity of the dengue surveillance system (including routine hospital-based reporting and primary-care based enhanced surveillance), and time required to demonstrate elimination of locally-acquired dengue in Yogyakarta city, assuming the detected incidence of dengue decreases to zero in the future. Age and gender were included as risk factors for dengue, and detection nodes included the probability of seeking care, probability of sample collection and testing, diagnostic test sensitivity, and probability of case notification. Parameter distributions were derived from health system data or estimated by expert opinion. Alternative simulations were defined based on changes to key parameter values, separately and in combination.Results For the default simulation, median surveillance system sensitivity was 0.131 (95% PI 0.111 – 0.152) per month. Median confidence in dengue elimination reached 80% after a minimum of 13 months of zero detected dengue cases and 90% confidence after 25 months, across different scenarios. The alternative simulations investigated produced relatively small changes in median system sensitivity and time to elimination.Conclusion This study suggests that with a combination of hospital-based surveillance and enhanced clinic-based surveillance for dengue, an acceptable level of confidence (80% probability) in the elimination of locally acquired dengue can be reached within 2 years. Increasing the surveillance system sensitivity could shorten the time to first ascertainment of elimination of dengue and increase the level of confidence in elimination.What is already known on this topic - summarise the state of scientific knowledge on this subject before you did your study and why this study needed to be done The incidence of dengue, a mosquito-borne viral disease, has increased worldwide in recent decades. However, a novel vector control intervention based on the release of Aedes aegypti vectors infected with the wMel strain of Wolbachia pipientis bacteria, which inhibits arboviral infection and transmission in mosquitoes, has been shown to substantially decrease the incidence of dengue. A randomised controlled trial in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia, demonstrated a 77% reduction in dengue incidence in areas treated with the Wolbachia intervention. Field-based and modelling studies have predicted that the Wolbachia intervention could reduce dengue transmission to the point of elimination of locally-acquired dengue. The feasibility of elimination of dengue as a public health problem through city-wide deployment of Wolbachia intervention, complemented by other vector control measures and enhanced clinical surveillance, is being tested in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia, as part of an additional study. For any planned infectious disease elimination program, demonstrating that elimination has been achieved requires effective surveillance for dengue and robust statistical methods. The aim of this study was to develop a scenario tree modelling framework to guide planning for the potential elimination of locally acquired dengue in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia.What this study adds - summarise what we now know as a result of this study that we did not know before This study constructed a scenario tree model to represent the dengue surveillance system in Yogyakarta city, including hospital-based and clinic-based surveillance. The model was parameterised with risk factors for dengue, as well as the steps in the surveillance pathway, from healthcare seeking to notification of a positive case. This study suggests that with a combination of hospital-based surveillance and enhanced clinic-based surveillance for clinical dengue cases, an acceptable level of confidence (80% probability) in the elimination of locally acquired dengue in Yogyakarta city can be reached within 2 years of the last detected case. This suggests that routine clinic-based and hospital-based passive surveillance for dengue is sufficiently sensitive to plan for and confirm elimination of local dengue transmission in Yogyakarta city.How this study might affect research, practice or policy - summarise the implications of this study The findings suggest that pragmatic demonstration of the elimination of locally-acquired dengue can be reached in a shorter timeframe than the alternative approach of convening an independent expert review panel, as commonly used for other infectious disease elimination programs. The scenario tree modelling framework offers a replicable, robust method for planning and assessing progress towards elimination of dengue as a public health problem following full implementation of the Wolbachia intervention and enhanced clinic-based dengue surveillance in Yogyakarta city, Indonesia. The framework can be readily expanded and adapted to different geographic settings where the Wolbachia intervention is also being implemented to control and eliminate dengue.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementMBT, AH and ES received funding from the World Mosquito Program for this work. KLA and CPS acknowledge funding from the Wellcome Trust for this work (grant 224459/Z/21/Z). CI, RAA and AU acknowledge the financial support of the Tahija Foundation. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis, preparation of the manuscript or the decision to publish.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:As the development of the scenario tree modelling framework did not require collection of new data from research participants, ethical approval for the development of the scenario tree modelling framework was not sought. The institutional review boards of Universitas Gadjah Mada and Monash University gave ethical approval for The AWED cluster randomised trial of the Wolbachia intervention, which was the source of some data for this study, and the ongoing clinic-based enhanced surveillance study of dengue elimination in Yogyakarta, in which this surveillance framework will be applied.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. ER -