@article {Bhaskar2023.01.26.23284807, author = {Deepika Bhaskar and Gargi Singh}, title = {Flushing water regularly inadequate to protect water quality in gravity-fed water supply systems with storage tanks during long-term lockdown}, elocation-id = {2023.01.26.23284807}, year = {2023}, doi = {10.1101/2023.01.26.23284807}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Flushing of water is recommended to prevent the growth of opportunistic pathogens, corrosion, and deterioration of the water supply network during short-term lockdowns. However, the efficacy of flushing fixtures in water supply networks with intermittent gravity-fed supply during long-term lockdowns is unknown. A laboratory-scale premise water supply network with a secondary storage tank connected to a gravity-fed drinking water distribution network was operated for 52 weeks to compare the efficacy of flushing water once a day (1D) vs. once in three days (3D) to preserve water quality. The tap water sampled from buildings (building) and overhead tanks (OHTs) prior to the pandemic served as a benchmark for comparison. The water quality trended as 1D = 3D \< building \< OHTs, with both the 1D and 3D yielding {\textquoteleft}poor{\textquoteright} quality water. The water in 3D had higher levels of 16S rRNA gene copies, sul1, and intI1 relative to 1D; this difference was more pronounced (2-3 orders of magnitude) during summer. The levels of sul1, intI1, and DNA marker of Legionella pneumophila in biofilms sampled at the end of the operation of the laboratory-scale premise water supply network trended as elbows \> visibly corroded pipes-sections \> taps. The levels of heavy metals in some tap water samples exceeded the WHO recommendations and BIS standards for drinking water: 32\% of 1D samples (30/93), and 31\% of 3D samples (29/93) exceeded the standards for Pb, (10 ppb); while 48\% (45/93) of 1D samples and 35\% (33/93) of 3D samples exceeded the standards for Fe in drinking water (300 ppb).Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the Faculty Initiation Grant of the Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India (FIG/100762) and the Department of Science and Technology, India (Ref no. DST/TMD-EWO/WTI/2K19/EWFH/2019/337 (Action Research Stream)).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesI confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscriptAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/30/2023.01.26.23284807}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/30/2023.01.26.23284807.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }