TY - JOUR T1 - Potential for High Dynamic Range Sedia Limiting Antigen Antibody Assay to Support Viral Load monitoring during Antiretroviral Therapy JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2023.01.26.23285058 SP - 2023.01.26.23285058 AU - Joseph B. Sempa AU - Alex Welte Y1 - 2023/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/30/2023.01.26.23285058.abstract N2 - Introduction Viral Load (VL) monitoring is a crucial component of patient care during antiretroviral therapy (ART) but is not routinely available in many resource-constrained settings, where millions of patients will require care for decades to come. We hypothesise a serologic ‘recent infection’ test (Sedia LAg assay) which has a high dynamic range for detecting antigen-driven antibody response can provide informative proxies for VL trajectories.Methods We analysed data linked via specimens in a well-described repository for recent infection test benchmarking (CEPHIA collaboration). Patient panels were comprised of 1) observations straddling ART start; 2) observations from a period of stable viral suppression; 3) observations straddling rebound after a period of viral suppression. We analysed an individual’s Sedia LAg ELISA normalised optical density (ODn) trends within these categories. Using groups 2) and 3) we evaluated the specificity and sensitivity of a proposed proxy for “the latest observation is at a time of VL rebound”; proxy was defined as follows: we estimated patient-specific mean-previous-ODn for all observations with at least two preceding virally suppressed observations. We considered various thresholds to define both “VL suppression” and “ODn uptick”.Results In regression analysis by category: 1) ODn gradients are statistically significantly negative just after ART-start (p=0.010); 2) During periods of stable viral suppression, ODn tended to decline, but not statistically significantly, for a range of clinically meaningful “VL suppression” thresholds; 3) comparing ODn values just before, versus at, “VL rebound”, ODn changes were statistically significantly increasing at rebound (p= 0.001). In the analysis comparing groups 2) and 3), at a Z score threshold of 0.8, the proposed proxy for a first viral rebound had an observed specificity and sensitivity both close to 90%.Conclusion The high dynamic range of serological tests previously investigated for defining ‘recent infection’ has potential, as demonstrated using the Sedia LAg ELISA, to provide meaningful information about the success of ART, during treatment initiation, at times of stable suppression, and to flag possible viral rebound. It should be investigated how this can be combined with patient management workflows and (clinical and) other data, to provide efficiencies in long-term monitoring viral control in resource-limited settings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP) under the Career Development Fellowship TMA2019CDF-2760Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data used as part of this analysis were published as part of Sempa et al. 2019I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced are available online at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220345.s008 https://zenodo.org/record/4900634#.Y9Kcl3ZByUk ER -