PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Prabesh kumar Sahu
AU  - Sibasish Sahoo
AU  - Namrata Chatterjee
AU  - Jitendra Majhi
AU  - Atanu Kumar Dutta
AU  - Kalyan Goswami
AU  - Amit Pal
TI  - Comparative evaluation of serum lithium estimation in serum samples using plain glass vial and serum clot activator vacutainer by reflectance photometry principle
AID  - 10.1101/2023.01.11.23284245
DP  - 2023 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2023.01.11.23284245
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/14/2023.01.11.23284245.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2023/01/14/2023.01.11.23284245.full
AB  - Background The collection of blood samples in different vacutainers can affect the result of serum lithium estimation due to the presence of distinct additives added in the blood collection vacutainer for enhancing the clot formation process. The presence of these additives has proven to interfere with laboratory results of biochemical analytes. In this case, both the pre-analytical and the analytical phases have a significant impact on the accuracy and precision of the test result. Thus, it has become a challenge for the lab physician to estimate lithium in any clinical laboratory setup.Materials and Methods In total, 100 patient samples were collected and paired into clot activator vacutainers and plain glass vials. Both the paired collecting tubes after centrifugation were processed immediately via Vitros 4600 analyzer working on the principle of reflectance photometry. Both the paired tubes were stored at 2-8 degrees centigrade and were further analyzed, at 24 and 48 hours respectively, from the time of their collection. The statistical analysis was done in IBM® SPSS® software version 23.Results There was a significant difference in the lithium values obtained from clot activator vacutainers in comparison to glass vial. The difference between the measurements of the lithium levels was statistically tested by ‘t’ test where it was observed that the lithium measurements by the two different collecting tubes differed significantly with a Confidence Interval of 0.03 to 0.06 implying the level of agreement of both the methods are not similar. But there was no statistical difference in the lithium values estimated at 24 hours and 48 hours of collection.Conclusion In this study, lithium levels measured by clot-activated vacutainers are found to be low as compared to lithium levels measured through glass vials. There is no apparent change in lithium values obtained at 1hr, 24hrs & 48hrs from their collection, when measured from the glass vials and the clot-activated vacutainers respectively, by the Vitros 4600 dry chemistry analyzer.Summary Statement Serum Lithium estimation in clincal laboratory may be done different methodologies, but the result may vary due to change in principle of investigation and the pre analytical and analytical interferences.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional Affiliation: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani. Approval of the Ethics Committee of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences Kalyani was obtained. Reference Number: IEC/AIIMS/KAlyani/Meeting/2022/47I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors